what? fred? you're asking Facebook to offer up some content created inside facebook and let it be shared with the outside world? wow, that would be nice.
AndyFinkle
· 1 year ago
Will evolve just like SMTP (email connectivity), and all the disparate Instant Message services. All the legacy SN's will go kicking and screaming, but ultimately many third parties offering this type of integration will force a standards body to create common protocols. I agree with you 150% ...I can't wait.
It would be nice if facebook made this change. BTW - like your outside.in integration:)
Joe Lazarus
· 1 year ago
The FriendFeed approach is pretty nice, though I'm not sure it would get much use on Facebook for me personally simply because so few of my Facebook friends are Twitter users. I imagine the Facebook / Twitter overlap is pretty low whereas the FriendFeed / Twitter overlap is quite high. It's probably a niche feature for Facebook, but I agree it would be nice to have.
I'd also like for Twitter to implement improved integration with Facebook on their end. Specifically, I'd like a better way to update Twitter automatically with my Facebook updates. I can do that today by importing my Facebook status RSS feed through TwitterFeed, but there's a several hour time delay which doesn't work well with real-time updates. Also, when I post an update to Twitter, I'd like a check box that lets me selectively choose which Twitter messages to share on Facebook.
Nathan Bowers
· 1 year ago
Man I love Twitter. Facebook is just such a chore: "so and so changed their picture", "let's clog your inbox with low signal emails", "somebody you didn't even know in high school now wants to be your friend", etc...
Here's my continuum of connectivity:
1) Email, IM, Phone: People dear to me and people I work with.
2) Twitter and RSS readers: People I think are interesting. They might be funny, informative, or leaders in their field, but the key is that they are high signal people. If they get noisy or irrelevant I can stop paying attention, no harm, no foul. Note that "people dear to me" aren't automatically on this list, and they shouldn't be. Just because you love someone in real life doesn't make them interesting on the internet.
3) Blog: Me broadcasting to the world, but often connecting with people in comments and becoming Twitter friends with them.
4) Facebook, LinkedIn, traditional social networks: Too much overlap of "people I care about in real life", "people I work with", "people I find interesting", "people who find me interesting", and "people I knew 15 years ago who now want to be friends for some reason". Because of all that social overlap, I have to worry more about offending people if I tune out say, a friend of a friend, so I add them, but my "feed" gets noisier.
However, networks like Facebook will always be bigger than ones like Twitter because Facebook has a much easier learning/growth/value curve. You sign up for Facebook and it will find people you know and you get that initial rush of connectivity and good feelings. You quickly run out of connections you value though, and then the noise kicks in. With Twitter it's harder to get started, but once you get hooked it's more rewarding/addictive.
When Twitter was having its worst uptime trouble, big names like Leo Laporte tried similar services but they always came back because that's where their users are. So because everybody stays on Twitter, everybody stays on Twitter in a feedback loop. Meanwhile Friendster, MySpace, and Facebook users have no problem jumping to the next big thing when stability becomes a problem or when their parents "friend" them.
Ravi
· 1 year ago
What it would also do, is make Twitter more mainstream perhaps?
RacerRick
· 1 year ago
I stopped using Twitter to update my Facebook status.
Too many Facebook peeps thought there was something wrong with me.
Ryan Graves
· 1 year ago
Facebook is very "closed" compared to most other services in this space. I find myself signing into Facebook less and less these days. However, my less techy friends are still only on FB and use it religiously. I agree that they need to start letting people integrate the services or they will begin to lose their "lead" as more non-techies jump on the techy or web 2.0 tools.
tomkrieglstein
· 1 year ago
Funny Fred, when I look at my Twitter feed, 15 of the first 30 are from people porting their Facebook Status into Twitter. So you are going one direction and they are going the other direction.
Jens
· 1 year ago
What a great acquisition pitch. :) Let's see what happens.
I personally think it would be interesting if Facebook bought Twitter and integrated it. However, Facebook would need to become more open than they currently are, how likely do you think that is?
andyswan
· 1 year ago
Just give me the ability to reply to "messages" and confirm friends from my blackberry without having to log in. Of course, then I would NEVER log in.
And the wall....well the wall just proves to me that I'm not really facebook's target :)
All Comments
www.twitter.com/A_F
BTW - like your outside.in integration:)
I'd also like for Twitter to implement improved integration with Facebook on their end. Specifically, I'd like a better way to update Twitter automatically with my Facebook updates. I can do that today by importing my Facebook status RSS feed through TwitterFeed, but there's a several hour time delay which doesn't work well with real-time updates. Also, when I post an update to Twitter, I'd like a check box that lets me selectively choose which Twitter messages to share on Facebook.
Here's my continuum of connectivity:
1) Email, IM, Phone: People dear to me and people I work with.
2) Twitter and RSS readers: People I think are interesting. They might be funny, informative, or leaders in their field, but the key is that they are high signal people. If they get noisy or irrelevant I can stop paying attention, no harm, no foul. Note that "people dear to me" aren't automatically on this list, and they shouldn't be. Just because you love someone in real life doesn't make them interesting on the internet.
3) Blog: Me broadcasting to the world, but often connecting with people in comments and becoming Twitter friends with them.
4) Facebook, LinkedIn, traditional social networks: Too much overlap of "people I care about in real life", "people I work with", "people I find interesting", "people who find me interesting", and "people I knew 15 years ago who now want to be friends for some reason". Because of all that social overlap, I have to worry more about offending people if I tune out say, a friend of a friend, so I add them, but my "feed" gets noisier.
However, networks like Facebook will always be bigger than ones like Twitter because Facebook has a much easier learning/growth/value curve. You sign up for Facebook and it will find people you know and you get that initial rush of connectivity and good feelings. You quickly run out of connections you value though, and then the noise kicks in. With Twitter it's harder to get started, but once you get hooked it's more rewarding/addictive.
When Twitter was having its worst uptime trouble, big names like Leo Laporte tried similar services but they always came back because that's where their users are. So because everybody stays on Twitter, everybody stays on Twitter in a feedback loop. Meanwhile Friendster, MySpace, and Facebook users have no problem jumping to the next big thing when stability becomes a problem or when their parents "friend" them.
Too many Facebook peeps thought there was something wrong with me.
I personally think it would be interesting if Facebook bought Twitter and integrated it. However, Facebook would need to become more open than they currently are, how likely do you think that is?
And the wall....well the wall just proves to me that I'm not really facebook's target :)