-
Website
http://avc.com/ -
Original page
http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2008/05/apple-tv-vs-rok.html -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
ShanaC
1217 comments · 71 points
-
daryn
213 comments · 14 points
-
kidmercury
827 comments · 103 points
-
howardlindzon
207 comments · 71 points
-
Charlie Crystle
203 comments · 35 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Getting Computer Science Into Middle School
1 day ago · 259 comments
-
End of Year Music Posts
22 hours ago · 39 comments
-
How To Get Me To Hang Up On You
3 days ago · 158 comments
-
Open APIs and Open Standards
4 days ago · 207 comments
-
Trading Deals, A Lost Art?
2 days ago · 78 comments
-
Getting Computer Science Into Middle School
I did an in depth blog post on the AppleTV a few months ago. http://youarekillingme.net/?p=36
It supports video rentals and does not require a PC. It also supports browsing photos from friends (via Flickr and .mac I believe) and can stream YouTube.
Fred
From the apple website: "Already have Apple TV? Get all the new features — including movie rentals and more — in a free software upgrade."
http://www.apple.com/appletv/upgrade/
lalala
On a different point, I feel like TIVO should be doing a better job in this arena. As home entertainment device with an internet connection that is already hooked up to a bunch of TVs, it really has a chance to get moving and provide a valuable service to consumers. Cable companies have eroded the value of DVR (and its subscription fees), but TIVO still has some fans who pay for it and it has added some features. Does no one use Amazon Unbox? Isn't that basically what iTunes is offering and doesn't Hollywood want to limit Apple bargaining power by having multiple providers? Am I way off base/missing something about TiVO?
Roku & Netflix would need to add for more content than old movies.
AppleTV or a Mac Mini, through iTunes & the Internet provides fresh content from TV sans NBC,but even NBC with a web browser, from all major movie studios, YouTube, and all the latest mashups & indie content from the web. Now that DirecTV won't work with TiVo for HD, they're about to lose me to Apple products/services.
What I need is for Apple TV to include a DVR + BluRay and I will be very happy.
Only 10,000. But at least it's a start.
convenience beats quality every time
its a software problem. we just need a twitter for media, where your devices can follow each other and sending/streaming content back and forth is easy.
thanks for the shoutout :)
Netflix's all-you-can-eat model is definitely better than Apple's buy or even their rent. Jobs has said that people want to own their music because they want to listen to the same stuff over and over. But the same is not true for video. Netflix has proved that.
Right now, I'm a redbox guy. I can usually get them for free. =)
The problem for Netflix is that by the time they can get real movies licensed for streaming (a long ways out), Apple will have cornered the market.
Here is the thing about Apple that most other companies don't have. The ability to recognize something isn't working and changing direction. I've gotten to the point of almost canceling my Netflix service because I find myself renting or purchasing shows from AppleTV more and more.
1. it's cheap
2. it's simple
3. i like the streaming model
4. i like the subscription service versus pay-per-play
Complaints about the 10k movie library are valid, but that's clearly going to change over time, and it really just shifts usage to more of a browsing what's available model than a get specifically what you want model. I likened it to a farmer's market, where you might not always get your tomatoes, but you'll always walk home with something to eat... Or, even like going to a local video store while you're on vacation; if you want to watch a movie, you'll come away with something. Hell, you might discover a gem you wouldn't have otherwise considered. Plus, you still have your normal netflix queue coming in in the meantime.
Also, to the point that it's not open, and it doesn't allow you access to x, y, or z: I'm happy with a simple, cheap, device that does one thing well. If I want access to photos, or music, or web browsing from my tv, I'd probably just buy a mac mini (maybe with your super-secret software one day!) but $99 seems pretty nominal for enhancing a netflix subscription I already have.
That said, I'd love if it expanded to include other online video content (podcasts, hulu, youtube, whatever) but movies alone are a solid enough base to get me to buy in now -- I ordered mine yesterday.
a. 15 votes isn't enough data to get a real sample
b. Apple TV is sexier and much higher on peoples' radars.
Zach
I ordered a device as an impluse purchase - as will many other Netflix subscribers.
Finally, and I'm sure I'l be criticized for this point, I think there is a lot to be said about the physical factor. The Apple TV, IMO, is MUCH more attractive then the Roku and looks much better next to my television/media set up. Belittle it all you want, but I like my gadgets to look good, especially the ones that take center stage in my living room.
b) Roku just came out and no one has really played with it yet.
I've yet to get an AppleTV. I'm still hoping for an all-in-one box that will allow me to access Netflix, Amazon's Unbox, Hulu (all Big Media downloads/streams), while allowing me to do all the things AppleTV does now without having to hack the AppleTV. I would love to be able to rip all my DVDs into one digital library (with a backup, of course), and still have the freedom to download or stream from other media services, other than just iTunes.
But I will most likely buy an AppleTV in the next three months because I'm not seeing anything else on the horizon any time soon... And I love watching me some movies.
I actually haven't looked at the Netflix device yet at all, but I wanted to second the point about how much better Take 2 is compared to the original Apple TV. The HD video rentals are alone a huge breakthrough -- it's definitely the best way to watch HD movies right now, IMHO (though I realize the quality is slightly worse than Blu-Ray, and also that I'm an outlier in that I was never very good at dealing with the postal side of Netflix.)
But the really cool, and telling, thing about Take 2 is that they fundamentally redefined how the product worked -- with a free software upgrade! The syncing, the direct transactions with the iTunes Store, the general detaching of the whole thing from iTunes itself -- it was a total rehaul of the product. Now, the original product definitely needed the overhaul -- it was like a quarter baked, I'd say, when they shipped it. But it shows their willingness to really listen to the market and radically change paths when they need to. And who knows, maybe music streaming and subscription is next -- no doubt thanks to this blog!
I have a mac mini with more than 500 hours of video in the library. Ripped all of my DVDs and added the over-the-air (DirecTIVO) that I want to archive. I pulled out the 5 disc DVD changer - just use the Mac.
I don't bother with Parallels - I use WIndows for Excel and other work apps, but not at home. On my HTPC, it's iTunes, Front Row, and Handbrake for ripping. I fail to understand why it's not more common.
Oh - I will consider an Apple TV for the second TV. Not yet, and I would consider a second, used Mac Mini if the Apple TV take 3 does not include a disc player.
Stay away.
³from any internet radio stations featured in iTunes²
What about from any stream on the web, period?
as to "any stream,"--yeah dig you fred. i too want it all. but you're getting way caught up in early adopterville. apple is about architecture not technology. if you wanna live in an open source geodesic dome, cool by me (and you'll find a lot of other people who'll join you). but the ipod's success shows that many more people in the consumer marketplace prefer clean white, aluminum post-war buildings with a protective moat--ipods and itunes and iphones and maca. they want a simple interface and simple technology for what they rightly understand are lifetime digital problems.
i find it odd that you're cool chasing musical ubiquity at the expense of long-term strategic innovation. apple is not "donkey-ass" (again, what's w/ the language, dude?) it is simply doing what's right for the company and its users by leading them to a risk-adjusted solution that users seem to like, iterating towards imperfect but market-sweeping solutions. you are a latecomer to macs so i suspect that you have that pc gene in you that says, "windoze sucks so bad, we have to tear it down w/ homebrew strategies." again: that's the geodesic domes way. long term mac users recognize that they have a good product that keeps getting better.
so give it up fred: where do you want to live--a geodesic dome with hand pumped showers or a cool calatrava (or maybe that's zaha hadid) building with the latest technology built into a systemic user-based solution? the choice is between the hard intellectual work of techne or the joys of starchitecture and convenience. they're not entirely exclusive but you should see how different they are. apple tv is imperfect but it really is a sweeping solutiion for most folks who want great music (w/o spending a grand on a sonos/rhapsody solution) or a crappy netflix solution.
the same time. They piss me off so badly some times and their approach to
content is the biggest place they piss me off.
Sorry for the emotion but it was real.
fred
and VC's dont invest in the innovative hardware/software companies where you have to 'rip your own content' because of perceived market share.
At 1/3 the cost of the device, then no additional costs for the movies for me, this is a no brainer.
Now sure it's more complex if you want to stream content from your computer. I mean you have to type in a 5 digit code into iTunes. Ok so not very complex but it is more!
Roku has one advantage, which is a subscription model. If I could add a large back stock of older content to my appleTV for $9/month I'd be all over it as long as the content was not total crap (which much of the netflix streaming content is but still this is the one Ruko win)
The advantages for AppleTV are a bit more:
1) Exactly the opposite of what the author indicates, AppleTV has a vastly greater quantity of free streamed content via YouTube and Podcasts.
2) Photo access. If you just can't figure out your computer for streaming then get over it. Post to flickr and you are set. You can also get both photos and video content streamed from .mac.
3) Quality. Even on the best internet connect Roku equates at best to the standard def AppleTV content. For me AppleTV was the most cost effective way to get HD movie content to my TV.
4) Computer Optional: I didn't think I'd care about this because I like iTunes but there is something to be said for surfing your content directly from the device and the AppleTV UI is very good.
5) New content. As much as I would like the back catalog, I want new movies too. Apple is making new movies available the same day as the DVD's and has an ever growing catalog of HD content (currently 372 titles)
6) Push Streaming. AppleTV also supports AirTunes so you can control it from your computer to push music to your home theater (and other airtunes devices). A cool side note is that when streaming this way your remote controls your computer.
So between the two AppleTV gets my vote. And Fred, calm down and get a grip. Why are you bashing on Apple for not streaming everything on the internet but you give Roku a pass? Roku only streams netflix content! No ABC, NBC, CBS or HULU! At least I know the AppleTV has the hardware to allow Apple to continue to expand the product as they did with the take 2 software update. Hell, I'm more angry at netflix for not just negotiate a contract with apple to put this same service on AppleTV so we don't have to have this conversation.
If and when apple makes it possible to stream anything on the web on an
appletv or an iphone, I'll calm down and get a grip
Until then I am going to keep pushing for a fully open platform
If I can do it on the web, why can't I do it on an apple tv or an iphone?
fred
I think Apple is turning much of the Technology world into an Image business, it doesn't matter (as much) which is better, but which is cooler. Currently, Apple is the coolest. I don't think they would loose any poll right now. Didn't the I-Phone beat blackberry on ya poll the other day?
Blackberry is an incredible brand
My kids all want blackberries not iphones because blackberries are the
coolest in their world
fred
And as a side note, I can't believe that blackberries are actually cooler in your kids world, are you serious? In my world its the device for first year analysts and secretaries...that's what's going to ruin their brand I think...it used to be a status symbol, now its a status symbol to be important enough NOT to have one (but have an iPhone...a brothers got to stay connected somehow :)
(Apple rentals are priced per unit and expire, whereas a good rental system is priced as a subscription, and limits the number of concurrent films available. Nobody in today's culture should have to put the effort into renting a movie during the RIGHT 24 hour period. What happens if you have to run out for an emergency halfway through your film and don't get back in time? Sorry, you have to pay again).
OK this is turning into a longer comment than I meant.
My main point is that while AppleTV is probably a sleeker solution, I would much prefer the netflix model for movie watching. I currently use Netflix streaming through the Media Center I have hooked up to my TV, and that works well for me.
i can't speak for both as i've only used appletv. they've done a great job improving it since launch. i can now buy music and rent tv shows/movies without having to have my laptop open requiring it's access to itunes. their quantity and quality of movies for rental has massively increased. we actually use the thing!
i also like using airfoil on my laptop to stream rhapsody to the appletv. slick.
No internet poll regarding apple will ever yield insight.
The people who have Apple TV vote for Apple TV
The people who have the Roku vote for Roku.
I'm still confused as to which way to go, but I'd strongly prefer $8.99 a month for unlimited streaming to $3.99 to $4.99 per movie!
Chris