<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>A VC - Latest Comments in AT&amp;amp;T Is Discriminating Against People With Good Credit</title><link>http://avc.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://avc.disqus.com/atampt_is_discriminating_against_people_with_good_credit_85/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 11:03:58 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: AT&amp;amp;T Is Discriminating Against People With Good Credit</title><link>http://avc.com/2007/09/att-is-discrimi/#comment-95989</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Don't try to add your company name to the &lt;a href="http://Yellowbook.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Yellowbook.com"&gt;Yellowbook.com&lt;/a&gt; for the free listing...&lt;br&gt;I went on line in October 2007 to ad our a very small company's name, phone, address and description of business per the "Free Listing" rules.  In turn, this generates a soliciation email from an advertising consultant.  He wants to maximize our business.  I told him my credentials, wife, offfice manager of the business and we were not interested in any additional services, we were only interested in the phone number listing per the Free Listing requirements.  I spoke to  him in length about how we were not interested and maybe down the road we could consider it. In turn 3 days later, he calls the main number and asks to talk to the owner, my husband, who  knew I had contacted &lt;a href="http://YellowBook.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="YellowBook.com"&gt;YellowBook.com&lt;/a&gt; but didn't know I said no to the additonal paid services.  He was a fast talker and got my husband to approve for some additional services on &lt;a href="http://yellowpages.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="yellowpages.com"&gt;yellowpages.com&lt;/a&gt; for $98.00 a month for a 12 month contract.  They have his voice recording on tape that he approved of it.  Then four months later we start getting a bill for the services.  The listing has my personal cell number for the listing and a clip art of their choosing, ugly if you ask me... I call to say this is wrong we didn't approve of these services.  I was told that they had verbal recorded contract, and I got to listen to it.  &lt;br&gt;What I am upset about it the advertising consult w/ A T &amp;amp; T after speaking with in length of not wanting or asking for additional services and not respecting my authority at the time, decided to pursue it even further by contacting my husband.  Now my husband works in the construction field and he is always going ninety miles an hour and doesn't sit at a desk where he can contemplate all the aspects..... and of course he listens about half of a conversation.  He approves of the contract as he is recalls it $98.00 a year not a month...even though he states on the recording a month.  I am not disputing the verbal recording contract, what I am disputing and upset is that I had the authority and I am the person who pays and collects the money in the business and knew at the time, we were not able to set  ourselves up for that expense, but the advertising consultant needed his commission so badly that he didn't respect my word and pursued it on until he got what he wanted.  Now, we are responsible for paying for a service for 12 months that we don't want or will generate any business for us.  Since we added our name in October 2007 for the free listing... we haven't gotten any customers saying that's how they found us.  So, the statement goes to say nothing is for free...its right now it will be $1176.00 and can automatically renew...we caught this injustice a few days into the billing cycle not months and  not trying to get something for nothing.  They would rather us be mad and upset and just pay it then trying to win us over back in buying their products and services.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I quit buying At &amp;amp;T products over 10 yrs ago due to their customer care, I don't even have a home/business phone because of AT &amp;amp; T buying SWBT.  That's how serious I am about not using At&amp;amp;T.  They are big company who disregards indivual's NO and keeps going until they find someone who says yes!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Melynda Oliva&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Melynda</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 11:03:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AT&amp;amp;T Is Discriminating Against People With Good Credit</title><link>http://avc.com/2007/09/att-is-discrimi/#comment-21358</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I had the same exact thing happen and actually just returned from an AT&amp;amp;T store for the second day, and now have spent over 10 1/2 hours and they placed a hold stating that I could not activate my iphone using a pre-paid plan.  After the hold was placed, 5 AT&amp;amp;T employees, 2 supervisors and 3 more managers could not replace the hold, so still have not been able to get an iphone with the pre-paid account (I don't want to commit to the 2 year contract -- am a tech blogger at &lt;a href="http://wize.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="wize.com"&gt;wize.com&lt;/a&gt;).  They sent me home with a Tilt, (which I am returning tomorrow) have tried to charge multiple restocking fees, activation fees, and overall the experience was enough to make me say, is the iPhone really worth this???&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">squay</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 20:08:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AT&amp;amp;T Is Discriminating Against People With Good Credit</title><link>http://avc.com/2007/09/att-is-discrimi/#comment-2763</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Fred, thank you for your reply. Please be aware that "donating to charities" vs "getting some perspective about actual discrimination and illegality" are two different things. While I'm glad that you're doing the first, that does not provide credit for the second. I believe some perspective would have adjusted the attitude of the original post.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately, the use of terms like "discrimination" and "illegal" distracted from your point. My point is that no one with an understanding, respect, or empathy for those who have really experienced the result of those words would have used them for an issue such as this.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Genevieve</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 08:15:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AT&amp;amp;T Is Discriminating Against People With Good Credit</title><link>http://avc.com/2007/09/att-is-discrimi/#comment-2715</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's got to be wrong. I'm a UK citizen who goes to the US on business (so no Social Security ID), and bought an iPhone and once I failed credit check they put me on a pre-paid plan without much problem. Although I'm not in the US much it is still preferable to using my UK phone over there and getting stung with the roaming rates - and the iPhone is a very useful web/mail device around the house.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Simon Coles</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2007 13:45:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AT&amp;amp;T Is Discriminating Against People With Good Credit</title><link>http://avc.com/2007/09/att-is-discrimi/#comment-2709</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think if the default for comments was chronological and not 'hot' - whatever that means - you might have only had to repeat your apology twice........&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I will say that every deadbeat I know has an iPhone - coincidence?  I think not.........&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jackson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2007 12:37:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AT&amp;amp;T Is Discriminating Against People With Good Credit</title><link>http://avc.com/2007/09/att-is-discrimi/#comment-2659</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Already commented on the AT&amp;amp;T part of this post. Yet the "deadbeat" statement continued to haunt me, so here goes. Many artists and musicians I know (and I'd wager the majority of the non-picked-up-by-labels indie bands you listen to) don't have credit. Meaning they've not established a credit history "proving" they can pay on time consistently. Reasons vary, but for many artists and activists they choose to NOT be part of any credit system as a matter of principle.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Having "no" credit as far as the AT&amp;amp;Ts of the world are concerned might as well be "bad" credit. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Evelyn Rodriguez</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 12:53:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AT&amp;amp;T Is Discriminating Against People With Good Credit</title><link>http://avc.com/2007/09/att-is-discrimi/#comment-2646</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Genevieve - every ad that runs on this blog, every page view, generates revenue that goes to charities. I give all the money that this blog generates away. so i am sort of doing what you suggest.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;although it may seem like "rich guy gets upset when he can't have it his way", my point was that AT&amp;amp;T is forcing people to pay $1400 (two year contract at $60/month minimum) to use the iPhone unless the fail a credit check.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;that's wrong regardless of whether i can afford it or not.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Fred&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 06:11:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AT&amp;amp;T Is Discriminating Against People With Good Credit</title><link>http://avc.com/2007/09/att-is-discrimi/#comment-2643</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You will find simple instructions on how to activate and unlock your iPhone without any involvement with AT&amp;amp;T here:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://modmyiphone.com/wiki/index.php/IPhone_unlock_OS_X_Part_1" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://modmyiphone.com/wiki/index.php/IPhone_unlock_OS_X_Part_1"&gt;http://modmyiphone.com/wiki...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 02:15:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AT&amp;amp;T Is Discriminating Against People With Good Credit</title><link>http://avc.com/2007/09/att-is-discrimi/#comment-2642</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Please forgive me for being so harsh, but I can't stop thinking about the lack of perspective in this post; this seems like a spoiled person's complaint.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Beyond what others have pointed out (and what you've graciously apologized for), it's not only the choice of words... the entire attitude seems over the top. It's absolutely your right to not use their service. It also seems a bit silly to start throwing around "discrimination" and "illegal" because you can't get an expensive little gadget to work. You're a tech blogger with an unusual situation that a few employees at a mediocre phone company didn't have the authority to handle. This is not a real problem.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Next time, if this sort of experience is such an inconvenience, please consider getting some perspective by learning about and then donating (the same amount of money that phone costs) to a charity or an organization that fights actual discrimination and illegal activities. Thank you.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Genevieve</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 01:19:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AT&amp;amp;T Is Discriminating Against People With Good Credit</title><link>http://avc.com/2007/09/att-is-discrimi/#comment-2622</link><description>&lt;p&gt;me too :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 17:44:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AT&amp;amp;T Is Discriminating Against People With Good Credit</title><link>http://avc.com/2007/09/att-is-discrimi/#comment-2621</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i'll say it for a fourth time. sorry about the poor choice of words.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 17:43:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AT&amp;amp;T Is Discriminating Against People With Good Credit</title><link>http://avc.com/2007/09/att-is-discrimi/#comment-2620</link><description>&lt;p&gt;can't unlock until i activate, at least that's what i've read&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 17:41:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AT&amp;amp;T Is Discriminating Against People With Good Credit</title><link>http://avc.com/2007/09/att-is-discrimi/#comment-2619</link><description>&lt;p&gt;sorry Niki. bad choice of words.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 17:40:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AT&amp;amp;T Is Discriminating Against People With Good Credit</title><link>http://avc.com/2007/09/att-is-discrimi/#comment-2618</link><description>&lt;p&gt;same apology to you John. bad choice of words.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 17:39:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AT&amp;amp;T Is Discriminating Against People With Good Credit</title><link>http://avc.com/2007/09/att-is-discrimi/#comment-2617</link><description>&lt;p&gt;sorry for using that term Nate. i was annoyed when I wrote the post and my choice of words wasn't so great.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 17:39:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AT&amp;amp;T Is Discriminating Against People With Good Credit</title><link>http://avc.com/2007/09/att-is-discrimi/#comment-2616</link><description>&lt;p&gt;To "Fakerichardbranson"&lt;br&gt;I looked at your site, and agree with Fred. Your the kind of jerk that makes space shuttle jokes. The sort I walk away from in bars. Won't get into a dialog on Freds blog, but you are, well, what was it Fred called you?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stephen L. McKay</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 17:19:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AT&amp;amp;T Is Discriminating Against People With Good Credit</title><link>http://avc.com/2007/09/att-is-discrimi/#comment-2613</link><description>&lt;p&gt;To "Not a Deadbeat". While Fred's remark may sting to some, please remember that those who have never been there don't know. From what I understand, Fred could pay cash for neurosurgery, if he needed it, and I certainly hope with all my heart that he never does.&lt;br&gt;I went from rags to riches, back to rags, and then made a comeback again in my 47 years on the planet. It took me 7 years to re-build my credit. It was hard work, but I still realize that even though some of the situation that got me in that place was out of my control, part of it surley was.&lt;br&gt;Don't be so hard on Fred. I'm sure he didn't mean it the way you took it. I didn't.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stephen L. McKay</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 16:50:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AT&amp;amp;T Is Discriminating Against People With Good Credit</title><link>http://avc.com/2007/09/att-is-discrimi/#comment-2612</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Totally agree AT&amp;amp;T sucks (currently I'm a very dissatisfied customer). I'd walk out on my contract in a heartbeat if there were anything DECENT to jump ship to. (Already tried a few.)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I like Andrew's suggestion to unplug from *all* carriers. Is there any way VC's can aid in getting WiFi ubiquitous so we Skype?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Evelyn Rodriguez</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 16:44:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AT&amp;amp;T Is Discriminating Against People With Good Credit</title><link>http://avc.com/2007/09/att-is-discrimi/#comment-2610</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Fred, AT&amp;amp;T is the ONLY reason I refuse to get my iPhone luvin' on!  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 15:59:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AT&amp;amp;T Is Discriminating Against People With Good Credit</title><link>http://avc.com/2007/09/att-is-discrimi/#comment-2606</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So what are you going to do with your iPhone?  Unlock it and try it on T-Mobile?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tammie</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 15:19:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AT&amp;amp;T Is Discriminating Against People With Good Credit</title><link>http://avc.com/2007/09/att-is-discrimi/#comment-2603</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've read of this workaround, but I'm not sure it works.  Register the phone and use 999-99-9999 to set up your account.  You'll fail the credit check and be given the prepaid option.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I couldn't agree more on AT&amp;amp;T.  I just moved over to a Helio Ocean (Sprint network) and the call quality is much, much better.  One bar gets me a well connected, clear call.  One bar on AT&amp;amp;T and I wouldn't even bother answering, I knew it would drop the call.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeff</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 14:12:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AT&amp;amp;T Is Discriminating Against People With Good Credit</title><link>http://avc.com/2007/09/att-is-discrimi/#comment-2600</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think they are onto you, do you hear 'beeps' when on your phone?  Do you notice people walking on the street behind you?  Do you go to sleep at night, then wake up in the morning?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If so, it's likely that AT&amp;amp;T and SteveJobs have people watching you.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'd lay low for a while - go underground.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'll contact you by the usual methods when it's safe to resurface.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jackson</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 13:58:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AT&amp;amp;T Is Discriminating Against People With Good Credit</title><link>http://avc.com/2007/09/att-is-discrimi/#comment-2597</link><description>&lt;p&gt;And apologies, that was supposed to say I hope you DON'T get into an accident.  I may be pissed, but I'm not inhumane.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Not a deadbeat</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 13:37:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AT&amp;amp;T Is Discriminating Against People With Good Credit</title><link>http://avc.com/2007/09/att-is-discrimi/#comment-2596</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dear jerk,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Not everyone with bad credit is a deadbeat.  Count yourself among the lucky ones who haven't had massive medical bills or who suddenly lost a job and was unable to find another right away.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;When this happens to you, it ruins your life.  Not only are you not allowed to get loans for car, house, or school, but you can't do simple things like rent apartments, and people are starting to be denied jobs when employers do a credit check.  THAT is discrimination, so quit your fucking whining.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So I hope you get into a major car accident and have lingering problems that your insurance won't cover and you are unable to pay your bills.  I'm sick and tired of the "it can't happen to me" attitude that jackasses like you carry around.  It CAN happen to you.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Not a deadbeat</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 13:35:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AT&amp;amp;T Is Discriminating Against People With Good Credit</title><link>http://avc.com/2007/09/att-is-discrimi/#comment-2595</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've always disliked AT&amp;amp;T, ever since I dropped them about four years ago for T-mobile, where I've been quite happy since. I definitely want an unlocked iPhone, but it sounds like in order to unlock it you need to activate it with AT&amp;amp;T first?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jason Preston</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 13:11:52 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>