<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>A VC - Latest Comments in Diplomacy By Humor</title><link>http://avc.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://avc.disqus.com/diplomacy_by_humor_65/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 23:49:20 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Diplomacy By Humor</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/04/diplomacy-by-hu/#comment-336523</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Funny clip. Nice to see SNL creating some good stuff again.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also, funny how most comments bash Hulu while ignoring the video. Personally, I don't mind seeing a short pre-roll ad if the video is filtered by someone with good taste. A small price to pay for a great three minute clip.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">clint</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 23:49:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Diplomacy By Humor</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/04/diplomacy-by-hu/#comment-335732</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Agreed.  The US is quickly becoming a walled garden for digital media services.  Hulu, unBox, Kindle, iPhone, yadda yadda.  It is amazing to me to see such progress - yes, that's sarcasm.  And (admittedly slightly off track), I'm dumfounded by the media's suprise regarding the number of unlocked iPhones.  The world is a big place.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NICCAI</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 19:18:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Diplomacy By Humor</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/04/diplomacy-by-hu/#comment-335040</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great funny brave piece. Bravo SNL!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Btw, in Iran, under the law, homosexuality is punishable by DEATH.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexuality_and_Islam" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexuality_and_Islam"&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve Kane</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:57:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Diplomacy By Humor</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/04/diplomacy-by-hu/#comment-333714</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The flaw in your argument is assuming the the quality of a video is known&lt;br&gt;before it's viewed. How do I determine whether I'm willing to wait 22&lt;br&gt;seconds (Hulu Pre-Roll + Ad Pre-Roll + Delay Time).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nickdavis</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 10:53:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Diplomacy By Humor</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/04/diplomacy-by-hu/#comment-333087</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Straming not visible outside the us...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Antonio</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 06:58:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Diplomacy By Humor</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/04/diplomacy-by-hu/#comment-333068</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The answer is overlays as google adsense for video and youtube have chosen them. The market will follow google eventually&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Fred&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 06:35:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Diplomacy By Humor</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/04/diplomacy-by-hu/#comment-332489</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nick, it's far from "mandatory" on the web...   specialized sites like  &lt;br&gt;gaming sites (one of the most popular vertical categories for video)  &lt;br&gt;have done pre-roll ads for years.   Year-after-year the stats for  &lt;br&gt;consumption of that content goes *up*.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You seem to be missing my point, and YouTube isn't a valid  &lt;br&gt;comparison.  It's a trade-off with respect to *quality*&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Like you, I wouldn't sit through pre-roll for piano-playing cats on  &lt;br&gt;YouTube either.   Nor for stupid skateboarding accidents.   Not even  &lt;br&gt;for LonelyGirl15.     Yet I have NO problem (and apparently neither do  &lt;br&gt;millions of other people) sitting through a brief pre-roll for an  &lt;br&gt;episode of 30 Rock, delivered via Hulu, direct to my machine on demand.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Your 22 second result is far, far, far beyond anything I've ever  &lt;br&gt;experienced.   I'm on the world's lousiest cable modem service in  &lt;br&gt;Topanga Canyon, California, and I've never had to wait more than 5  &lt;br&gt;seconds, *if at all*.     Then again, maybe you were picking an  &lt;br&gt;extraordinarily popular piece of content or something, who knows.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Thom Kozik</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 22:40:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Diplomacy By Humor</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/04/diplomacy-by-hu/#comment-332457</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Just because there is proof that post-roll commercials don't work doesn't mean that pre-roll commercials do. Someday they will figure it out, and I'd be willing to wager that the answer won't be pre-roll. I don't know how many times I've sat through pre-roll commercials on the network streaming sites only to have the show itself not work. Then I try to reload or open it in Internet Explorer, and am forced to watch again. It's a tedious process and a huge turn-off.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;YouTube was successful because you could click the button and the video just started. Immediately. No pre-roll. No "buffering....". It's now mandatory for video on the web. I timed the clip above and it was 22 seconds before I got to the content. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nickdavis</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 22:24:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Diplomacy By Humor</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/04/diplomacy-by-hu/#comment-331817</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Its not "too much". Its just not worth it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;How well would tv have taken off if they forced you to watch a&lt;br&gt;commercial every time you changed the channel?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nickdavis</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 17:39:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Diplomacy By Humor</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/04/diplomacy-by-hu/#comment-331474</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice to see so many West Village scenes in there. How wild would it have been to pass by that shoot?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Greg</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 15:33:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Diplomacy By Humor</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/04/diplomacy-by-hu/#comment-331454</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hulu = FAIL&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Only video you posted today I can't see from over here in the UK.  Given that this thing is actually _run_ by the major studios, how come they can't sort out the international rights?  Great example of internal company politics coming before users...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">agawley</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 15:26:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Diplomacy By Humor</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/04/diplomacy-by-hu/#comment-331443</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Just highlights how contrary to the Information Age it is that national legislative heterogeneity interferes with online communication and business; we rarely see digital national boundaries, but when we do, it's usually a surprising and awkward event, painful for all involved. The sooner the offline world adapts to online (global) realities, the better.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Philippe Bradley</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 15:21:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Diplomacy By Humor</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/04/diplomacy-by-hu/#comment-331405</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I had no idea when I posted the video. Sorry&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 15:10:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Diplomacy By Humor</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/04/diplomacy-by-hu/#comment-331170</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@nickdavis...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's not SNL's model, but Hulu's.   And to be fair, Hulu generally seems to "get it".  The pre-roll spots are very short to minimize offensiveness to the majority of the audience, but more important to their model  - they are wrapping *quality* content that there is audience demand for.  While I appreciate your perspective, there's ample proof (and dead/dying companies to validate) that  Post-roll commercials don't work.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;To Fred...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;While I laughed my ass off when this short first aired, and have passed it around the web a number of times, I don't know if I'd ever classify it as diplomacy.   I can't imagine that those images of Ahmadinejad played too well in Tehran or elsewhere in Iran, let alone helped advance a diplomatic message.   Might rank right up there in terms of offensiveness to them, below Dutch cartoons of Mohammed of course.   While I think I get your point (joke?), and pieces like this are analogous to Chaplin's &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Great_Dictator" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Great_Dictator"&gt;&lt;i&gt;The Great Dictator&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, aren't they just preaching to the choir.. those of us (US. UK, et al) on the outside who stand opposed to asshats like Ahmadinejad?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm sure there's genuine examples of diplomacy by humor that have been effective at change, I just can't think of one at this second...&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Thom Kozik</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 13:25:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Diplomacy By Humor</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/04/diplomacy-by-hu/#comment-331164</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I sure as hell wouldn't - i click off boring videos or articles, let alone spurious ads i have no interest in.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Philippe Bradley</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 13:21:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Diplomacy By Humor</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/04/diplomacy-by-hu/#comment-331162</link><description>&lt;p&gt;good thing you only serve your US readership with this video!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;gotta feel sorry for Hulu - as the child of the major studios it's tied by outdated, nation-based copyright systems where few other video sharing sites are.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Philippe Bradley</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 13:20:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Diplomacy By Humor</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/04/diplomacy-by-hu/#comment-331160</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You are telling me that it is too much to sit through a 14 second commercial?  And no I don't believe you would not sit through a commercial AFTER the content.  Give me a break.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BN1019</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 13:19:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Diplomacy By Humor</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/04/diplomacy-by-hu/#comment-331006</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow, Hulu is lame: "We're sorry, currently our video library can only be streamed within the United States."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Haran</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 12:08:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Diplomacy By Humor</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/04/diplomacy-by-hu/#comment-330974</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Someday they will learn. I might sit through a commercial AFTER I watch the content, but there's no way I sit through one BEFORE I see anything. Shouldn't SNL be more concerned with building an audience and not squeezing every penny out of every interaction?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As usual &lt;a href="http://chartreuse.wordpress.com/2008/04/12/mine-mine-mine-and-other-wrong-answers-to-wrong-questions-about-shyftr-and-the-way-things-work/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://chartreuse.wordpress.com/2008/04/12/mine-mine-mine-and-other-wrong-answers-to-wrong-questions-about-shyftr-and-the-way-things-work/"&gt;Chartreuse knows best&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nickdavis</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 11:54:41 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>