-
Website
http://avc.com/ -
Original page
http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/10/donors-choose-blogger-challenge-somethings-wrong.html -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
ShanaC
1228 comments · 73 points
-
daryn
213 comments · 14 points
-
kidmercury
829 comments · 104 points
-
howardlindzon
207 comments · 71 points
-
Charlie Crystle
205 comments · 35 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Thoughts on Blackberry Fail
12 hours ago · 66 comments
-
Getting Computer Science Into Middle School
2 days ago · 267 comments
-
End of Year Music Posts
1 day ago · 46 comments
-
How To Get Me To Hang Up On You
4 days ago · 158 comments
-
Open APIs and Open Standards
5 days ago · 207 comments
-
Thoughts on Blackberry Fail
You remind me of Matt Damon on Entourage last Sunday.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MxODvIILFq8
As a rule, we want our children at a minimum to do the three Rs, possibly a bit more- to think critically, and to be able to pick up new, necessary skills more easily. From there, different communities choose to educate in a variety of topics because they feel they are moral and true topics that are necessary to pass on to their children. Some communities are fabulous at choosing topics you feel are revelant, some are not. Some communities seem to pick up on the fact that we have a changing economy, some are not. It is really up to people here to decide.
If I have to, I can teach my kids caculus and have done it and am doing so again right now
After taking an NY Institute of Finance class that covered statistics and probability, and was taught by a phenomenal instructor, I figured I'd buy the Teaching Company's video lectures on the same subjects. After struggling to resist the soporific effect of their videos, I was underwhelmed by them. The professor just totally skipped over the parts that look like magic to the uninitiated and spent more time on the minutia. Having attended inner-city public schools myself, I can't imagine my former classmates having a better reaction.
Maybe you're referring to something else entirely though.
Sometimes I think a lot of the misguided thinking on this subject stems from elites who didn't go to public schools growing up, so they assume most kids are like the ones they went to school with. Most kids don't have the aptitude or motivation to seek out a rigorous education on their own, and the ones that do are going to do fine without any charitable support anyway.
in reality kids just need to learn a few core things and then can learn the rest on their own. society simply needs to give them the resources to find what they want to learn and the people they can learn from and with.
http://www.straighterline.com/
blended with high end video lectures:
http://academicearth.org/courses/game-theory
AND all student questions posted twitter like along the time-line of the video. So that overtime the professor knows where his lecture fails, and he can begin to refine the video lectures 1,10,100,1000x - never again teaching live, never again answering the same question twice. Until there are only perhaps 3 lectures taught worldwide in Game Theory - those professors are millionaires, and all the other teachers have been fired.
That's what I mean by Napsterizing Education.
Decades ago, companies would just cut to the chase and give pencil & paper IQ tests to applicants, but Griggs v. Duke Power clamped down on that (some companies, e.g., Microsoft, have been known to turn their interviews into de facto oral IQ tests).
But here's what I'm after: at 6 months old the kid gets his first TV remote control, a ball with different colors that light up. The colored clowns on the screen jump when he presses their color. Soon he sees only a blue clown and if he presses the blue on the ball the clown jumps. For the 10% who don't figure that out, a video is shown of a kid with the remote doing it correctly. We have now identified the "visual learners" and for the rest of the learners life, he will taught differently than say the TK learner.
Every toy sold needs an internal wifi remote that interacts with video lessons. We have barely begun the long transition to video based knowledge transfer. Two way video (backchannel video) will knock down most all walls, even the K-8.
There is another angle with MBAs, but no one has stumbled on it yet.
How bout doing a meetup for non new york donors - Paris for LeWeb? London next time?
decision...just a bad one :)
I understand that government schools are where most of the poor kids are
stuck...I just question the "let's go to them" mentality....instead of the
"let's get them out" mentality.
In any event, I sincerely applaud what you're doing, will donate (I like to
be late in the contests...for the ego) and would LOVE to participate in any
voluntary capacity that your organization could tolerate from a libertarian
asshole :)
Keep it up and let me know....
Vouchers work. Let parents decide where to take that government school money.
If parents suck, very little will change no matter what money is tossed in the pot. Everyone continues to ignore the giant pink elephant in the room: Urban single-motherhood and the dismantling of the black family is crushing our society and creating a feedback loop of tragedy.
Organizations like Donors Choose would be more effective if we could chip in directly to send one child with a supportive and ambitious parent to a quality private school.
My donation will be sizable in any event, because the cause is worthy and Fred is asking....but it would be a lot higher if it went directly to getting one child out of the vicious cycle.
For starters, we could stop importing unskilled workers to compete with these kids for jobs and drive down their wages. We could also enact policies that would encourage more manufacturing companies to set up shop in the U.S. Those policies might include lower corporate income taxes, increased domestic energy production (to ensure adequate supply and put downward pressure on energy prices for energy-intensive businesses), relief of regulatory and legal disincentives, and a renewed emphasis on vocational education in high schools to produce more skilled workers.
Meager payment, but thank you for continuing to write and share your experiences!
Why don't we see more subscriptions that are directed at non-profits? That seems like it could really help remove some of the thought from the process.
It would be great if you could just "connect" to some system in a widget, set the amount and period, and say "go". Then you would maybe be subscribed to first hand accounts of what the money went to. I really like the way Charity: Water did this, with live streams of well drilling but also a twitter stream of pictures
http://twitter.com/charitywater
http://twitpic.com/jvrsw
You should also try to give something back to those who donate. It would be great if they could see a post early, get an early RSS feed, or something like that.
This is related to the recent thoughts I've had that blogs should be more like web apps. You should have a single sign on, subscriptions, and features built into each post that only subscribers can see.
Or, you can click this link...
https://secure.donorschoose.org/donors/lastingI...
i give all the ad revenue from this blog to charity. that's about $30k/year. so there are other ways to generate money to charity from blogs.
and i am giving back something by doing an invite only meetup for donors. i realize that is not very attractive to out of towners.
and give access to donors. That might be kind of hard. The long tail
of donor management should be easy though - not hard.
Pitching my contribution now. Good work Fred.
Sidenote: UX on donating without an account is a bit wonky. I wasn't able to add a message without an account, but had to make the donation before creating any account. Thus, one donation, one message, equals two entries for one transaction.
Anyways, thanks for hosting this.
Could you drop me a note at oliver (at) donorschoose (dot) org and let me know how best to reach you? I'd like to better understand the scenario you encountered so we can improve the DonorsChoose.org donor experience.
In short, every donor should be able to leave a msg for the classroom, regardless of whether they create an acct at our site, during the donation "check-out" flow. We do believe this is working smoothly in most circumstances.
So in connecting with you, I'm hoping to learn whether we have a bug in our check-out flow OR perhaps you were trying to leave a classroom msg in an interaction with our site that was distinct from your donation check-out.
If it was the latter, which is what I suspect, then your feedback will help us work the kinks out of that process.
Thanks for your assistance and thanks again for your generous donation!
Oliver Hurst-Hiller
CTO, DonorsChoose.org
Of course, I'll end this comment with a link to one of my school projects that needs funding:
http://www.donorschoose.org/donors/proposal.htm...
Jeff Fagnan at Atlas Venture is also throwing a charity wine party in Boston. Last year, they raised $40K for http://www.build.org. I'm sure he would appreciate it if you tweeted the word out. More info here: http://j.mp/hBqOQ.
"Donors" could be a good addition to our Curing Diabetes through iPhones campaign.
http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/pages/Curing-...
We've had good success thus far, raising approximately $3,000 in 2.5 weeks. A lot of the money was from family and friends who were linked to the page, however utilizing the iPhone for fundraising makes perfect sense.
Your number one selling point is how fast you can give to Donors using Payal...imagine if donations were accepted via iTunes/App Store?
We're creating a workaround for the 30% Apple fee...it's reasonable to believe that you don't want 30 bucks from your $100 going to the crew in Cupertino.
I went to private school myself, and it's so easy to forget how different a world that was. A friend of mine teaches in the DC school system, in a poor area, and routinely digs into her own pocket to purchase supplies for her students.
There are so many opportunities for efficiency in the educational system, but until that happens we should do what we can.
Thanks, Fred, for doing this - I tried to get some blogging friends of mine to participate, but they were too consumed by the charity fatigue that some other people have mentioned here.
"let's get them out" mentality."
Once you scale it, what's the difference? If enough poor kids end up in a fancy private school, that school will start to resemble an under-performing public school. Smart kids make good schools, not the other way around, and poor kids tend not to be smart. There are exceptions of course, but think about it: smart parents generally have smart kids; smart parents generally aren't poor; therefore there aren't many smart poor kids.
The site did not like a non-USA address and then crashed!
Kind regards
Kevin
Things are tight for me and Michelle, but we can scratch together some coins and I could definitely do some local "marketing" of the charity.