-
Website
http://avc.com/ -
Original page
http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2008/10/glue-a-social-n.html -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
ShanaC
1239 comments · 73 points
-
daryn
216 comments · 15 points
-
kidmercury
835 comments · 104 points
-
howardlindzon
207 comments · 71 points
-
Charlie Crystle
205 comments · 36 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Top Tracks of 2009
14 hours ago · 49 comments
-
Top 10 Records Of 2009
1 day ago · 73 comments
-
Getting Computer Science Into Middle School
6 days ago · 281 comments
-
Open APIs and Open Standards
1 week ago · 207 comments
-
Thoughts on Blackberry Fail
4 days ago · 77 comments
-
Top Tracks of 2009
Some day, one of these kind of meta-browsing experiences will stick. Maybe it's glue. : )
Would be valuable for me to hear :)
How to add Glue to other pages:
From your Glue profile you can claim your online profiles (Blog, Twitter, Facebook, Flickr, etc.). After you claim these pages, when other Glue users visit them, they'll be able to see your Glue activity.
Sites, services (and individuals) can add support for Glue to their pages by adding AB Meta to their site: http://blog.adaptiveblue.com/?p=975 O'Reilly has already enabled this for all of their book pages. It's a simple and straight forward way to integrate into Glue.
As for platform-izing the offering, we're always interested in exploring other ways that Glue can bring value. This seems like an interesting thought. There are a few announcements coming soon on this front...
www.gluecon.com
(and albert's involved)
Then again, I'm saying all this having installed it all of two hours ago -- I definitely like the idea enough to give it a shot :)
There is a selfish use case, sort of like implicit social bookmarking
Importing contacts from other networks helps, too.
Michiel de Boer, Zecco
I do think the glue bar should be less deep, more like the NY Times People bar
Bit alarming that it has set up a My profile already - guess its kinda cool - maybe be nice to ask first :-)
Thanks for fast response.
One problem. On a MacBook in Firefox, when I click on a user to see their info (as I did Fraser on the demo), there's no obvious way to close the user window without leaving the page. Am I missing something?
If not can you drop me an email and we'll dig into it: fraser[at]adaptiveblue
Identifying friends and colleagues with common interest has high value, and semantically understanding the content of a page vs a simple URL seems a meaningful innovation - more useful than Clutzr, BlogRovr (Esther Dyson), Stickis (Esther Dyson), Socialbrowse (Y Combinator), which will share clickstreams of URL or highlight contacts that have visited the same page.
But from a privacy perspective, what happens if a user buys a book called "Living with Manic Depression" or "Getting Ready for Divorce" on Amazon. Does that information get broadcast to his or her network and the broader Glue community? Seems ripe for Facebook Beacon issues that surfaced when products bought on Amazon were quietly broadcast via their feed.
Passively contributed information (clickstream, items viewed) seems inherently more difficult to manage than explicitly contributed information (status updates). I'm curious to dig in and see how they handle it. Couldn't easily see how in the FAQ or privacy policy.
I hope alex and/or fraser will weigh in on this one
I've been on Glue for a few months now. Given that privacy is a concern for all Glue users AdaptiveBlue has added functionality that allows you to have complete control over your data. You can remove any item from your stream of 'things', you can protect your actions so that only approved friends can see them, and you can also delete all of your data if you want.
While connecting people around the things they love delivers social benefit, we realize that privacy is critical in a system like this. A guiding principle that we've followed since the founding of the company is that the individual is in complete control of their own data.
This principle helped shape the development of Glue - from the highest level of privacy to individual interactions.
To begin with, unlike other passively contributed systems such as Beacon, Glue is completely consumer opt-in from the start.
Additionally, an individual has the ability to protect their presence within Glue. This feature is similar to Twitter's privacy setting where only those who have been explicitly approved by the individual will be able to access their activity.
Glue is only active on pages about everyday things - books, movies, music, etc. It is inactive on all other pages. If you do not see the Glue bar appear, it is not active.
But even this isn't enough because - as you say - there may be books or movies or music albums that you're not comfortable sharing. In situations like this there's a top level function to remove your connection to a specific thing. When the Glue bar appears if you mouse over your avatar you will see a delete link. This will permanently delete your connection to this object. Additionally, this feature is available from within your collection of things. Mouse over the object's thumbnail and select delete to permanently delete it.
Finally, while passive actions do surface interesting connections we realize that they do not form bonds as strong as explicit behavior. For this reason we only temporarily store the 20 most recent passive actions while saving all explicit behavior.
I do hope this starts to answer your questions. This is a topic that we want to be upfront about and make sure that we get right.
Our FAQ and Privacy Policy should have additional details on this.
If you have any further questions please post them here or contact us directly - fraser[at]adaptiveblue
Thanks for the response. I installed Glue and read your comments in tandem and I think the design is responsible and innovative.
The decision to only observe what the user is looking at on specific sites - Amazon, for example - is responsible and shows a lot of restraint. The design of activating the toolbar on the top of the browser when behavior is being observed makes it clear when Glue is active. The limit on recall to the 20 most recent items observed also errs heavily on the side of privacy, and reminds me of FireEagle, Yahoo!'s location platform that limits memory to the last location the user was seen at. I've been impressed at FireEagle's approach to privacy, and am impressed at this approach. I'm leaving it installed and looking forward to seeing it work.
Antony
Judging from most of the comments, all issues are correctable. The fundamental idea is very interesting.
Glue seems to increase connection by several orders of magnitude. I think some people enjoy the heightened level of connectedness, but I think the proponents overestimate how connected people want to be.
Judging from the implementation, AB strikes a good balance here. The obvious issue of having to install a plugin has already proven not to be a problem for AB. In fact, less work has to be done than if you were to install a plugin into a wordpress blog.
As far as feature recommendations, I would stay away from new features for a while, as enticing as it may be. Get the service stable, and make slight UI adjustments instead. The service is already good enough to use w/o any feature additions for the vast majority of people. Great job @fraser, alex, and the rest of the gang.
I can easily see this service being exploited by spammers to make fake profiles, and staking footprints on heavily trafficked web pages, so their fake profiles appear, for the 'people you don't know' functionality.
There are a couple of things about Glue that are focusing on protecting people from spam:
1. There are no destination pages - the profiles are accessible from any page you are on.
2. It is browser based, which automatically means it is more secure
3. Like in Twitter you choose who to follow, so while spammers might be on the page, their are not in your face
and the worst spam would be inappropriate avatar - something that any network would suffer from.
So you would see "29 friends, 24 Recent People, and 63 Live People". Integrating http://firef.ly/ with Glue. It would be like a Facebook Live Chat, but instead, an Internet/AdaptiveBlue Live Chat. Way more powerful I think.
Right now, with this release of Glue, we're focusing on connecting friends around common things that they like. While we may not often be looking at the same thing in real-time as our friends, we generally interact with similar items over time. And, by capturing the interaction across time and different websites, we're able to make that connection.
The real time component is definitely cool, just a different direction from our focus with this release. I've made a note about the suggestion.
There was also a NY company that was introducing a consumer offering (for blogs) couple months back.
As far as Glue, looks pretty cool. Nice job!
Looks like I picked the wrong day to stop sniffing Glue.
When are you in NYC again? I missed you when you were here the other week because I was neck deep in Glue. Would love to meet you though (I'm working on the appropriate 'gosh, you're tall' line).
plays nice with Twitter and Tumblr is it's best shot of adoption.
As creative types play with this and then blog how easy it is, numbers will increase.
Folks don't want to just bookmark stuff. The suppliers have over reacted
forever trying make the next big (and better and more profitable) Delicious.
Folks want to be HEARD. If I can easily link to a hot post,
then tweet my brilliant tumblr reblog(and *Original thoughts*), then I'm using it!
I like it.
Thanks for "ADAPTIVE BLUE".
Similar to Adaptive Blue (and Me.dium), Others Online has interesting technology on the back end, and we all focused on consumer-oriented products utilizing that technology. Well over a year ago, we used our technology to connect people with each other (social net style) as they browsed the Web. This is what Glue and Me.dium do as well (at a high level).
But we determined early this year, after a spike in user growth (adding thousands and thousands of users in a short time), that there was no way our revenues were going to exceed our costs. The scale of user acquisition was not achievable without spending a massive amount of money -- essentially "buying" users, which I wasn't willing to do. My understanding is that Me.dium is also having a very hard time achieving any meaningful scale.
As a result, we pivoted away from B2C and focused on B2B. And it's working ... we have well-known and successful partners (online publishers and networks), we're currently adding several hundred thousand users per day, earning revenues and have a near-time path to profitability (knock on wood)! By Q1 we expect to be reaching more than 100M unique users per month. Now that's the sorta scale I can work with!
Someone will crack the "social browsing" nut eventually, but it's not going to be us. We sincerely wish Adaptive Blue, Me.dium and all the others the best of luck, and hope they'll stay the course until they reach success.
I hope you make this work though. I like the concept of this company (SocialBrowse too) but think the evolution of the internet is headed in the other direction (i.e. smart, filtered, consolidation) this is relevant to an individual based on social recommendations, AI, etc.
There is already a product named Glue since 2006. http://gluenow.com
Sounds like a great product but stealing a product name is not cool.
I realize there isn't much at our site, since we're doing a rebuild, but here's our previous demo video so you can get an idea about what Glue is about.
Not sure why you would want your users to get confused with a pre-existing product. We get emails daily from Glue people. Bad idea.