-
Website
http://avc.com/ -
Original page
http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/02/latitude.html -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
ShanaC
1239 comments · 73 points
-
daryn
216 comments · 15 points
-
kidmercury
835 comments · 104 points
-
howardlindzon
207 comments · 71 points
-
Charlie Crystle
205 comments · 36 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Top Tracks of 2009
14 hours ago · 49 comments
-
Top 10 Records Of 2009
1 day ago · 73 comments
-
Getting Computer Science Into Middle School
6 days ago · 281 comments
-
Open APIs and Open Standards
1 week ago · 207 comments
-
Thoughts on Blackberry Fail
4 days ago · 77 comments
-
Top Tracks of 2009
I am accepting everyone on Google Latitude so you can stalk me and see where I am. scobleizer@gmail.com
I've just added you.
R.
Nice to talk about Latitude. The service UI is amazing I agree, didn't see on BB but on Nokia E71. The big point is my concern about privacy and push-location realtime. In my opinion is a bit too much, as you are writing you won't share with a large network, like Twitter of FB. We have built Mobnotes, a mobile geo social utility, with another aim. You can broadcast your location if you want, when you want but you need to do a specific move. No realtime push, which in my opinion not yet mature and people care about privacy more than we can think.
Another point is that outside of US the mobile data charge are still pricely, so it take some "euro" to load google mobile map.
You mean like serving geo-location specific ads? or is that too obvious?
more a matter of when than if, I'd argue
or geo-location analytics? (how many people saw my ad on google billboards?)
And by and large I am quite comfortable with lifestreaming.
you have a huge data mining feuture to serve you adds that can say i know you have a time gap of 2 hours and you are interested in buying a shirt there is a sale 2 blocks from here. give this code to get a discount bla bla
From working with ISO 18000-7 RTLS (Real-Time Location Systems) for the "enterprise", some of the companies offer ~3ft. resolution (in 3d spaces) using wifi (Pango Networks, Ekahau, Wherenet, etc.) Best example I have for very high resolution is Ubisense (found at the logical url), but they use UWB (not part of 18000-7) and is only useful within buildings. [Edited for clarity and greater context.]
Agree that ultimately, location fix will be a hybrid solution and a function of cost, accuracy & privacy issues. Latitude does a good job of using hybrid location technologies but is a long way from good indoor resolutions.
I think the new Latitude release is great but it still does not work on all devices and carriers and they claim. I have tested this on multiple devices on multiple carriers and am finding some issues with it. However overall when it works it really rocks. It especially works well on a GPS enabled device on a network/carrier that does not block the location API.
For example;
# 1 On WM device (without GPS) on Verizon and it cannot get or pinpoint my location. It is not able to use cell-tower ID as well. Carrier restrictions still prevail. I wonder if Verizon will ever grow up.
#2 If you as a Latitude user (do not setup your location or prefer to hide it), then another user who looks for you gets a location that latitude determines. Latitude seems to scour your address book details on that person's phone to get any available information to display your location. It may use your zip from address etc..)
#3 If it gets location by this, it can display peope in the wrong places. It consistently puts one of my friends in the middle of a swamp (He is nowhere close to that). It may be using tower-id, but still it is way off.
#4: Cool features are one thing, but I think a lot of people prefer not to display their exact locations. The granularity of the location offered by Latitude (when it works) is stunning. For ex: It can tell exactly which direction I am facing or moving (this is with GPS though). On tower id info, it can tell your location to the nearest tower with a radius of 3000 meters.
In the end, If Google does open up the API and allow other third party application developers to build on this, we will see a whole new array of LBS apps. Then again, Carriers will ultimately determine the success of LBS apps, as they hold the key to the location API's open on the devices they sell.
I saw you at LeWeb08 and have been following your blog for quite some time but this is my 1st comment!
I think this Latitude product is not getting the buzz it deserves. For me it will be one major revenue source mainly by providing geo-ads on a mobile device - what are the good restaurants for me to go with Fred, I'm in Tribeca and he's in Soho. Gimme something in between.
But this is also major product for logistics and commercial departments wanting to track where their cars are at or where their commercial people is.
Of course this can become Big Brother so people should really deal with this with careful but the potential is just huge!
I can see that having a large network could be useful when you are traveling - hooking up with people at the airport/at a stop over. Potentially more useful than Dopplr/Trippit.
@Toomz
Not that I would lie to my wife, oh wait, I'm divorced already........
As for the privacy arguments in this discussion, I could see google adding an icognito mode like in Chrome. Although maybe that won't work, "Honey, why were you incognito last night when you said you were going to a client dinner?"
I guess if you've got something to hide, don't use this app.
And, would have been great when I was running a team of direct salespeople...
Mike
Gmaps freakin' dominates. I don't think they're 'slowly' doing it, I think they took over vs Mapquest, etc long ago. With the exception of some local services for countries not well-covered by gmaps, and live.com (MS) offers some formidable bird's eye photos.
1. Automate the pinging so that every hour it records your location. Make it smart enough that if your location does not deviate drastically from the prior hour then it does not record it. Reduces the dupes.
2. Allow an opt-in process where it logs all of your whereabouts and keeps it similar to the web search history. You can then pull up historical info of any period in your life and exactly where you were.
3. Building on top of the historical presence, allow you to match your location with someone else. Imagine you just met someone and Latitude was able to cross-reference this new associate info with your to see if you have been in close proximity anytime prior to your first meeting.
4. Triangulate your Gmail, Search History, Latitude and whatever else goog has about you into a dashboard that infers your life that day and answers where, what, who and when better then any human mind will ever be able to recall.
In any case, I think Latitude is a giant step into a world where nothing is ever forgotten.
btw apparently he is coding Dodgeball 2 now.
At the moment latitude isn't updating anything in a meaningful way about 'where' you are.
it also doesn't have any data extraction api's (yet).
The worst part of any of these services is not when they work right; that is actually quite interesting. The worst part is when they work wrong, and they automatically place you somewhere you aren't, and some concerned (or nosy) person pings you to ask about it.
The service gives you basic "record, semantically organize & publish" mechanism for your geo data:
0. Record using a variety of positioning devices (BB, Windows, Garmin ...) with rich annotations
1. Create a group of friends (currently supports public or private), select a set of apps (flickr, blogspot e.g) or create GeoRSS feeds.
2. Publish to these entities based on how you tag your location data (post to flickr; send email notification etc.).
3. Derive analytics from users data (e.g. fitness metrics, distance travelled, search based on location etc.)
We have built this on a SaaS model with a decent API & Widgets library. Now we keeping adding apps to link the geodiary service to.
thx,
Appreciate any feedback,
Shaili
http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/09...