<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>A VC - Latest Comments in My 140Conference Talk</title><link>http://avc.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://avc.disqus.com/my_140conference_talk/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 21:20:48 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: My 140Conference Talk</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/06/my-140conference-talk/#comment-11810171</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My youtube is an educational channel for gifted and advanced students, actually, making any student gifted and advanced.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Google naturally favors youtube videos for its search results so between my 20,000 subscribers (across 3 channels) and page one google visibility for keyword searches, If I start a series on "how to do long multiplication in your head," Then, make the last episode available exclusively to community members. The kids sign up.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RWK: disruptive tech/guerrilla</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 21:20:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My 140Conference Talk</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/06/my-140conference-talk/#comment-11578235</link><description>&lt;p&gt;right, but what that says to me is build engagement with facebook and&lt;br&gt;twitter and get free traffic&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:10:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My 140Conference Talk</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/06/my-140conference-talk/#comment-11564931</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great talk.  I've seen similar trends as you on sites I manage that (1) consistently churn out new content and (2) are engaged in Twitter and Facebook.  Sites I manage that don't do these two things get pretty much no traffic from Twitter or Facebook, however.   So I think it is a particular kind of site you are talking about here.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Melcrum</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:01:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My 140Conference Talk</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/06/my-140conference-talk/#comment-11551942</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'll check it out and get back to you&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 08:04:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My 140Conference Talk</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/06/my-140conference-talk/#comment-11530624</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wrote up the idea/gathered the thoughts. Mockup included. The mockup could apply to any social media interface. A collaborative effort between meta data/meaning tools and social media would be idea. Monetization for Web2010: &lt;a href="http://www.victusspiritus.com/2009/06/21/monetization-for-web2010/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.victusspiritus.com/2009/06/21/monetization-for-web2010/"&gt;http://www.victusspiritus.c...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Essel</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 11:26:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My 140Conference Talk</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/06/my-140conference-talk/#comment-11512834</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hmm in this context means I need to think about it&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 18:20:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My 140Conference Talk</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/06/my-140conference-talk/#comment-11507738</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hmm = "Interesting and potentially good" or Hmm = "What the hell are theses guys talking about?"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vladimir Vukicevic</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 14:44:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My 140Conference Talk</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/06/my-140conference-talk/#comment-11504686</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hmm&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 13:54:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My 140Conference Talk</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/06/my-140conference-talk/#comment-11504399</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Cool idea&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 13:43:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My 140Conference Talk</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/06/my-140conference-talk/#comment-11503112</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think that's a great idea. It retains some of the "personal touch/trust" since it connects to actual passed links by real people, but it also is able to scale those links to a potentially viable ad model.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vladimir Vukicevic</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 12:58:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My 140Conference Talk</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/06/my-140conference-talk/#comment-11503046</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree, that's one of the few different reasons that popped the dotcom bubble. But I think that now, almost 10 years later, we live in a different world.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Membership fees are just one of many different types of potential income. Advertising is still important but it will have to be different from before. The reciprocity you mention is spot on.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Because of this, I think that advertising shouldn't be eliminated as an option and a large opportunity. Advertisers are looking for partners now as opposed to just a channel - as the downfall of newspapers and the success of Google has shown.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;With the scale that social networking is reaching, figuring out new models can't be that difficult.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vladimir Vukicevic</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 12:55:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My 140Conference Talk</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/06/my-140conference-talk/#comment-11497492</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Vladimir, don't forget the dotcom 2000 IPO bubble popped because of a failure to consider and implement monetization. Users don't automatically donate cash because you give them something great. Businesses do when you make them more revenue.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Essel</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 07:21:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My 140Conference Talk</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/06/my-140conference-talk/#comment-11497466</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Very excited about monetization potential for not only social media (facebook/twitter/friendfeed) but for web content in general. The economy of the internet is evolving. I labelled gratitude as the virtual currency in social media, but that is usually shown with thanks and a link. &lt;br&gt;I'm worried about one hiccup. If passed links are the currency, how will advertising piggy back on them. Anytime I'm paid to refer something, my genuine recommendation has had all it's value removed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I alluded to an alternative form of monetization as a comment a few days ago on your blog (&lt;a href="http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/06/clearing-something-up.html#comment-11044338)" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/06/clearing-something-up.html#comment-11044338)"&gt;http://www.avc.com/a_vc/200...&lt;/a&gt;. An advertisement window (very Googlish) based upon the meta data (semantic) of passed links. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Essel</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 07:18:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My 140Conference Talk</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/06/my-140conference-talk/#comment-11494467</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This blog reads like a one to one conversation with your audience - your 140 talk achieved that as well. I think the Steve Jobs's of this world are particularly good at achieving that, which is part of the reason it makes them so engaging to listen to.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Henry Yates</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 02:01:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My 140Conference Talk</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/06/my-140conference-talk/#comment-11491414</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Of course! It's an idea I have been playing around with. Now I just need a CTO to help me build it out :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">charliepinto</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 22:43:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My 140Conference Talk</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/06/my-140conference-talk/#comment-11487501</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Twitter should think about developing some sort of pre-click link verification system, maybe in collaboration with Norton or VeriSign.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Who knows, that could be another potential revenue source. Verified links along with verified accounts.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vladimir Vukicevic</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 19:31:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My 140Conference Talk</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/06/my-140conference-talk/#comment-11486066</link><description>&lt;p&gt;To be honest, I winged it. &lt;br&gt;I forgot that I had to talk about passed links so I spent about five mins prior to the talk going over my passed links posts from memory and then just went up there started talking.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I don't plan on doing that again but I think you are right about slides&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 18:44:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My 140Conference Talk</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/06/my-140conference-talk/#comment-11486065</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks. I didn't know who did that&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 18:44:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My 140Conference Talk</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/06/my-140conference-talk/#comment-11486064</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree about url shorteners.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 18:44:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My 140Conference Talk</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/06/my-140conference-talk/#comment-11485771</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Can you build it?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 18:33:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My 140Conference Talk</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/06/my-140conference-talk/#comment-11485767</link><description>&lt;p&gt;They never were for people who are pushing the envelope&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 18:33:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My 140Conference Talk</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/06/my-140conference-talk/#comment-11485559</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I didn't realize that youtube is that good at driving traffic. I've not seem it in refer logs myself. What kind of community do you have?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 18:26:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My 140Conference Talk</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/06/my-140conference-talk/#comment-11451161</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Profitability is inevitable when there is a participatory audience of millions. That type of mass possesses inherent value that can pretty easily be tapped.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vladimir Vukicevic</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 11:16:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My 140Conference Talk</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/06/my-140conference-talk/#comment-11449093</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Follow the money&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 10:23:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My 140Conference Talk</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/06/my-140conference-talk/#comment-11448570</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As many hav said, really insightful, thank you. The one question I have is how will the SN's stay alive without a profitable business model? I run a ton of sites and also have seen the increase in traffic from the major and even some minor but well targeted SN's. I just dont know how of any of these sites/companies are going to be able to sustain their business without becoming profitable.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Fishman</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 10:14:31 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>