<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>A VC - Latest Comments in Out of Office Auto Replies</title><link>http://avc.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 09:54:20 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Out of Office Auto Replies</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2007/12/out-of-office-a.html#comment-49705</link><description>You could take a page out of Andy Sernovitz's OOF playbook. That's what I do now...Godin might call it "remarkable"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://jer979.blogspot.com/2006/12/daring-to-be-different.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://jer979.blogspot.com/2006/12/daring-to-be...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jer979</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 09:54:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Out of Office Auto Replies</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2007/12/out-of-office-a.html#comment-46203</link><description>It means I am not going to respond to stuff unless its important and even&lt;br&gt;then I might not respond as quickly as normal&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;At least that's what it would mean if I turned mine on&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Fred</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 01:00:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Out of Office Auto Replies</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2007/12/out-of-office-a.html#comment-46158</link><description>OOO Replys are one of the more ridiculous communiques of modern business.  In today's 24-hr mobile business world aren't we always working when out of the office?  Even though people turn these on, they still respond to email.  So what exactly does being OOO mean?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 23:28:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Out of Office Auto Replies</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2007/12/out-of-office-a.html#comment-45948</link><description>Look at you...you couldn't be geographically further from the office and you're still responding.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ceonyc</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 17:27:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Out of Office Auto Replies</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2007/12/out-of-office-a.html#comment-45926</link><description>That's a funny thought charlie!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 16:59:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Out of Office Auto Replies</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2007/12/out-of-office-a.html#comment-45890</link><description>Thanks for your comments, Fred. I'd removed the Feedblitz link from my blog, but it's up again, and we'll see if people are out there who prefer e-mail to online feed readers. I also traded e-mails with the company's founder and CEO, Phil Hollows. We'll watch this closely.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Louis Gray</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 16:16:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Out of Office Auto Replies</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2007/12/out-of-office-a.html#comment-45598</link><description>Who's ever really out of the office anyway?   As if GOOG could e-mail you on Christmas Day wanting to buy your company and you'd say, "Oh, sorry, I'm out of the office until Jan 2., could I get back to you then?"   &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't want to do business with anyone who is ever "Out of the Office."</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ceonyc</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 10:13:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Out of Office Auto Replies</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2007/12/out-of-office-a.html#comment-45454</link><description>It depends on how many subs I really have. FeedBurner says 80k. But so many&lt;br&gt;of those are not active, that its a totally useless number. I'd guess I have&lt;br&gt;more like 20k to 30k subs. And I have about 2k Feedblitz subs. So it's&lt;br&gt;something like 10% of my subs. But it's a very active 10% because it's&lt;br&gt;delivered to the inbox.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Fred</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 01:54:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Out of Office Auto Replies</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2007/12/out-of-office-a.html#comment-45418</link><description>I haven't seen my Feedblitz be all that successful, and have considered even turning it off, to point people to RSS online. Sounds like you still like the service. What's the % of your subscribers who use Feedblitz of the total? Is it going up, or stagnant?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Louis Gray</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 00:35:55 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>