<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>A VC - Latest Comments in Startup Advice Weekend</title><link>http://avc.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://avc.disqus.com/startup_advice_weekend/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:21:47 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Startup Advice Weekend</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/03/startup-advice/#comment-216023</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Not to be off topic, but I do think it can help a startup. Fred, do you have any links or information on budgeting for a startup to help a newbie get a better idea of how much they need to raise? Is this an unfair and too open ended question? In my case, I'm creating a social network and need some angel investing. Yet I'm having a hard time getting a real sense for what it would cost me to "float" for a year while I try to gain users. Any help would be great. Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ryan</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:21:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Startup Advice Weekend</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/03/startup-advice/#comment-215639</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dick,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The lazy web did the work for you&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's now in this comment thread for all to see&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;fred&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:54:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Startup Advice Weekend</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/03/startup-advice/#comment-215637</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think that's unfair to mike and dave&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Fred&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:54:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Startup Advice Weekend</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/03/startup-advice/#comment-215551</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I totally agree, particularly with the latter point&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Fred&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:30:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Startup Advice Weekend</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/03/startup-advice/#comment-214235</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oto ve Araç Kiralama'nın Türkiye'deki en kolay yolu.İster Minibüs Kiralama ister Otobüs Kiralama isterseniz şoförlü vip oto kiralama...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rent a car</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 04:08:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Startup Advice Weekend</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/03/startup-advice/#comment-214201</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If you ³strike oil² then you are generally in a good place, although we all&lt;br&gt;know the friendster story&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But what I have seen countless startups do over the years is miss the boat&lt;br&gt;with their first try, but because they have low costs, they try again and&lt;br&gt;get it right&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Flickr started out as a game company, for example&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;fred&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 03:12:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Startup Advice Weekend</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/03/startup-advice/#comment-214123</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;"Dave Winer, 0 successful startups"&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Not true.  ("Kids these days; just don't know their history.")  Here's some background: &lt;a href="http://productarchitect.com/more1987.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://productarchitect.com/more1987.html"&gt;http://productarchitect.com...&lt;/a&gt; ... AFAIK he made real money selling to Symantec.  He also sold &lt;a href="http://Weblogs.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Weblogs.com"&gt;Weblogs.com&lt;/a&gt; for a reported $2.3M.  In between: Frontier was influential in many ways, not to mention all the other things he's had a hand in.  Actually, Frontier is an interesting case study: a great product that didn't turn into a great company....&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ProductArchitect</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 01:13:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Startup Advice Weekend</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/03/startup-advice/#comment-213870</link><description>&lt;p&gt;TechCrunch is a successful niche publication.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Let's say TechCrunch has ~1,000,000 regular readers. That puts them at about the same scale as Gourmet Magazine.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The questions about techcrunch are how much space is left in the niche and can they extend beyond that niche. Back of the envelope calculations puts TC at grossing $5M a year. How much can that grow? How many people are there interested in tech startups are there that DON'T already read TC?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ErikSchwartz</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 22:50:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Startup Advice Weekend</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/03/startup-advice/#comment-213822</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Here's the link to the Andreessen post: &lt;a href="http://blog.pmarca.com/2007/06/the-pmarca-gu-2.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://blog.pmarca.com/2007/06/the-pmarca-gu-2.html"&gt;http://blog.pmarca.com/2007...&lt;/a&gt;  Enjoy!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NewWorldOrder</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 22:14:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Startup Advice Weekend</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/03/startup-advice/#comment-213820</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I totally agree.  I also agree with Reid Hoffman when he says that Distribution Strategy is more important that Product Strategy.  Think about it.  Microsoft arguably doesn't have the best OS, but they probably have the best distribution strategy.  Starbucks probably doesn't have the best coffee, but they definitely have one of the best distribution strategies.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NewWorldOrder</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 22:12:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Startup Advice Weekend</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/03/startup-advice/#comment-213767</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I disagree that you should ever tell anyone that you're trying to build a company worth $20B. It's great if you think that and even better if you accomplish it but one may sound foolish if they make it a stated goal. In our last company we thought we'd build a $20-30M company. We ended up building something more than 10x the size. We kept our heads down and focused. The goals kept getting bigger and bigger over time.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">stone</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 21:37:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Startup Advice Weekend</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/03/startup-advice/#comment-213756</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great sum-up.  It's true.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What has been bugging me lately is the lack of business sense that most VC's have.  There is this ingrained mind set that a start-up has to:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Have huge barriers to entry that the startup in question has somehow overcome.&lt;br&gt;Have a mature team already in place that have done this before. &lt;br&gt;Have a lock on IP like a patent. &lt;br&gt;Have killer technology.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There are many great business ideas that don't have any of these.  Businesses that:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1. Take advantage of a shift in market place&lt;br&gt;2. Apply new technology to an old problem&lt;br&gt;3. Employ smart dedicated people from other walks of life&lt;br&gt;4. Have quick ramp ups and quick demonstrations of feasibility&lt;br&gt;5. Rely on execution not re-inventing the world&lt;br&gt;6. Will be the next Starbucks, not the next Google (20 billion not 100's of billions)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I am frustrated  because I am in the process of getting the second type of business off the ground.  We have gotten funding but it won't be coming from any of the dozen VC firms I have talked to.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;-Stiennon&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Richard Stiennon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 21:30:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Startup Advice Weekend</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/03/startup-advice/#comment-213516</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think Michael Arrington *may* be successful someday. His blog is influencial in the start-up community. To be really successful he's going to have to broaden out a bit. That's a big challenge and will test Michael in numerous ways. We'll see how he does.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">stone</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 19:03:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Startup Advice Weekend</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/03/startup-advice/#comment-213476</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You wouldn't call TechCrunch a successful startup?  I sure would.  Not a huge exit yet, but it's growing and making tons of money.  And it's hugely influential.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think your comment is ironic given the "there is no real path to success" meme.  I've heard from both Marc and Ev (though the YCombinator program) and they are actually both humble enough to NOT offer a "3 steps to success" plan.  Read Marc's post on product/market fit: &lt;a href="http://blog.pmarca.com/2007/06/the-pmarca-gu-2.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://blog.pmarca.com/2007/06/the-pmarca-gu-2.html"&gt;http://blog.pmarca.com/2007...&lt;/a&gt; ...  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tony Wright</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 18:39:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Startup Advice Weekend</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/03/startup-advice/#comment-213410</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Totally agree with Harold. I have respect for Jason but would characterize his track record as *mildly* successful. Michael Arrington is a successful blogger but has a string of failures as a start-up founder. His advice about start-ups is often laughable and entertaining. I view Jason's rantings as entertainment, too.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's incredibly difficult to be successful. It's takes a lot of luck and some decent skills. What doesn't take any luck? How you talk about your successes.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">stone</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 17:50:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Startup Advice Weekend</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/03/startup-advice/#comment-213380</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Jason Calacanis, 1.5 successful startups&lt;br&gt;Michael Arrington, 0 successful startups&lt;br&gt;Robert Scoble, 0 successful startups&lt;br&gt;Dave Winer, 0 successful startups&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'd rather hear from people like Marc Andreessen, Ev Williams, etc. &lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">harold</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 17:30:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Startup Advice Weekend</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/03/startup-advice/#comment-213352</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't necessarily believe in the "field of dreams" approach. Build a cool product and they will come. You need to build useful products and you need to be able to properly introduce them to the marketplace. How you position a product is key to defining the customer base.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Being able to tweak ideas over time to adjust your model is also key to being successful.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">stone</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 17:12:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Startup Advice Weekend</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/03/startup-advice/#comment-213089</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think it's all great valuable insight, and it's comforting to verify we're already doing all of this.&lt;br&gt;(except using Macs exclusively, but that's because we need to support platforms other than Mac)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I might add another thing that I think is important in a tech startup: buying books and investing in continuous education.&lt;br&gt;One could argue this is something excellent developers should do naturally and if they don't do it they're not good enough to be in our startup.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But there's a different way of seeing this:   just as it is important to have generalists who can do anything from coding Ruby to dismembering a laptop, it's important to develop some sort of homogeneous company culture, speaking the same language, handling memes and concepts that aren't alien to any of the startup members.&lt;br&gt;It doesn't matter much if Joe listens to electronica and Jane is more keen on thrash metal,  but it is important the original team has to have a grasp the economics of the business we're running. (do they know who Marc is ?  and Chris Anderson ?)&lt;br&gt;There's antimemes too.  I don't think we can really work well with someone who thinks Microsoft Visual Basic is great technology.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's not enough to have great people, they have to have the right memes. (and they have to lack the antimemes)&lt;br&gt;And if they don't, it's important to enable those memes for them, instead of leaving it to chance.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">vruz</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 14:48:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Startup Advice Weekend</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/03/startup-advice/#comment-213063</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Coincidentally, this is the exact same advice you need if you're trying to build a career as an artist:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;- there is no one "path"&lt;br&gt;- make something people want&lt;br&gt;- persist&lt;br&gt;- husband your cash&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Yeah, def an excellent use of "husband" there, lulz&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ethan Bauley</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 14:29:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Startup Advice Weekend</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/03/startup-advice/#comment-213010</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Where do you put YouTube in this spectrum?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ErikSchwartz</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 13:49:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Startup Advice Weekend</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/03/startup-advice/#comment-212981</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've seen startups with great ideas but no tangible product fail.  I've seen startups with a great product and no business model fail.  What I have yet to see is a start with great ideas, a good product and fiscal discipline fail.  How one gets there:  I doubt there is a hard and fast rule, but people in the company have to have a sense of ownership.  It needs to be personal and not just for the founders.  That does not mean mistreating them (which in my opinion Jason is pushing the boundaries on)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mndoci</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 13:23:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Startup Advice Weekend</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/03/startup-advice/#comment-212959</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Part of the definition of a hot product is that it have a good business model. Otherwise I could have a hot product by setting up a store in Times Sq, and give people $5 bills for free. I bet that would be pretty popular but it's not much of a product. :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 13:07:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Startup Advice Weekend</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/03/startup-advice/#comment-212948</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think this is very cool!  All of these smart people giving advice/data to start-ups! I will be sure to read all of these posts above. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cory Levy</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 13:01:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Startup Advice Weekend</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/03/startup-advice/#comment-212888</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Fred,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I agree, there isn't one way for a startup to succeed.  Moreover, where there are patterns, they only apprear in hindsight.  I thought every venture investment I ever made was a winner on the way in.  Lately, I'm more focused on what common personality traits breakthrough companies exhibit, rather than the traditional scorecard:  great team,  hot market, etc.  i'm writing an entrepreneurial pulp fiction book about it here:  &lt;a href="http://wildrumpus.typepad.com/mediavc/2008/02/looking-for-t-1.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://wildrumpus.typepad.com/mediavc/2008/02/looking-for-t-1.html"&gt;http://wildrumpus.typepad.c...&lt;/a&gt; and here: &lt;a href="http://wildrumpus.typepad.com/mediavc/2008/03/east-of-wall-st.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://wildrumpus.typepad.com/mediavc/2008/03/east-of-wall-st.html"&gt;http://wildrumpus.typepad.c...&lt;/a&gt;.  I'd be interested in your thoughts.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">T D Klein</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 12:42:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Startup Advice Weekend</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/03/startup-advice/#comment-212875</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My point was a hot product is not enough.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If you have a hot product with a flawed business model, selling out early is your best option.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ErikSchwartz</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 12:38:16 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>