<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>A VC - Latest Comments in Super Bowl Ad Ratings</title><link>http://avc.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://avc.disqus.com/super_bowl_ad_ratings/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 23:25:15 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Super Bowl Ad Ratings</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/02/super-bowl-ad-ratings/#comment-6078220</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I read AVC throught Google reader and the link there to thumnit takes you to a beta site..  I request a intvite, get it by email, and sign up. No problems.  &lt;br&gt;then I visti thumnit site and see no rerfernce to this poll.  I poke around and still can't find it.  Visitng the AVC site I can see it all, but it is not easily accessbile on the thumnit site.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If this site aspires to be more than local restaurant reveiws (been there, done that) then improve the home page to make finding polls like this easier&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">john risner</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 23:25:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Super Bowl Ad Ratings</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/02/super-bowl-ad-ratings/#comment-5880531</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That video was taken down before I could see it unfortunately&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 20:17:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Super Bowl Ad Ratings</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/02/super-bowl-ad-ratings/#comment-5870033</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Cool Ad rating platform! this is taking twitter to another level combining with rapid feedback.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;btw, NBC still sold out this year's superbowl ad slot with a record high revenue this year, despite recession:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.wealthalchemist.com/Blog/2009/02/super-bowl-viewership-recession/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.wealthalchemist.com/Blog/2009/02/super-bowl-viewership-recession/"&gt;http://www.wealthalchemist....&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Wealth Alchemist</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 12:33:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Super Bowl Ad Ratings</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/02/super-bowl-ad-ratings/#comment-5817068</link><description>&lt;p&gt;and here it is in all its glory (its blurred out so somewhat PG)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CKfo5NsliVY" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CKfo5NsliVY"&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watc...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;how could they let that happen! &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">markslater</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 15:46:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Super Bowl Ad Ratings</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/02/super-bowl-ad-ratings/#comment-5816955</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Fred, thanks for sharing the Thummit data with your readers. The overall volume of tweets with opinions on the ads was pretty impressive. While the Top 10 (and bottom10) are always interesting, We found interesting results in the middle as well.  Some ads, like Cash4Gold were really polarizing - people either loved it or hated it, but few were in between. From a marketers perspective, that may not be a bad thing.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SeanGreene</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 15:41:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Super Bowl Ad Ratings</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/02/super-bowl-ad-ratings/#comment-5805173</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It was&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 06:46:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Super Bowl Ad Ratings</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/02/super-bowl-ad-ratings/#comment-5794446</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I liked Hulu and Doritos as well.  It seemed really toned down this year, disappointing.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jaygould</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 20:18:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Super Bowl Ad Ratings</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/02/super-bowl-ad-ratings/#comment-5793286</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The Doritios commercial was the most 'talked about' in my school today.  I thought it was pretty funny!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cory Levy</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 19:16:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Super Bowl Ad Ratings</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/02/super-bowl-ad-ratings/#comment-5787102</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I liked the Monster one better.  Career Builder one felt they were trying too hard!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jamie Lin</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 16:06:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Super Bowl Ad Ratings</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/02/super-bowl-ad-ratings/#comment-5785081</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think if we use the sample composed of AVC readers, it would clearly  &lt;br&gt;make the top 10. :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kiril</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 14:41:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Super Bowl Ad Ratings</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/02/super-bowl-ad-ratings/#comment-5784035</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Definitely agree with you on the CareerBuilder one. I mean how can you not like a koala getting hit in the face...and multiple times too. I love the ads during the usuper bowl and actually found something about the ads and if they were recession-proof or not. Whether they changed because of the downturned economy. Here's the link: &lt;a href="http://www.newsy.com/videos/super_bowl_ads_recession_proof/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.newsy.com/videos/super_bowl_ads_recession_proof/"&gt;http://www.newsy.com/videos...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Max</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 14:02:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Super Bowl Ad Ratings</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/02/super-bowl-ad-ratings/#comment-5783974</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Whoa&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That's nuts&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Surely a hack&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 13:59:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Super Bowl Ad Ratings</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/02/super-bowl-ad-ratings/#comment-5783399</link><description>&lt;p&gt;At least they'd be funny&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">matthewclemmons</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 13:34:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Super Bowl Ad Ratings</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/02/super-bowl-ad-ratings/#comment-5783275</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Man, I hated that teleflora commercial. I would never send flowers via them. They might come looking ugly and dead&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 13:28:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Super Bowl Ad Ratings</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/02/super-bowl-ad-ratings/#comment-5782947</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That was actually my favorite. I thought it was very clever.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shane</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 13:11:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Super Bowl Ad Ratings</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/02/super-bowl-ad-ratings/#comment-5778012</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I love the real time graphing under the viewer.  My top 3 are CB, Hulu and Teleflora.  I'm shocked the viewers didn't like the "no one wants to see you" comment...it was one of my favorite SB commercial moments last night.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">matthewclemmons</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 12:19:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Super Bowl Ad Ratings</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/02/super-bowl-ad-ratings/#comment-5777805</link><description>&lt;p&gt;we should ask the people of arizona what was best&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/7864733.stm" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/7864733.stm"&gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;in this day and age - that had to be a hack.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">markslater</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 12:09:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Super Bowl Ad Ratings</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/02/super-bowl-ad-ratings/#comment-5776403</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for posting that.  Interesting to compare web vs traditonal methods&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 11:25:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Super Bowl Ad Ratings</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/02/super-bowl-ad-ratings/#comment-5776358</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good point&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 11:23:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Super Bowl Ad Ratings</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/02/super-bowl-ad-ratings/#comment-5776356</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I guess not. I missed it getting more beer&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 11:23:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Super Bowl Ad Ratings</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/02/super-bowl-ad-ratings/#comment-5775831</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting to match these up next to the traditional admeter results:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/advertising/admeter/2009admeter.htm" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.usatoday.com/money/advertising/admeter/2009admeter.htm"&gt;http://www.usatoday.com/mon...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sean h </dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 10:57:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Super Bowl Ad Ratings</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/02/super-bowl-ad-ratings/#comment-5775810</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I liked it - I actually thought my brain had something wrong during it. The Hulu ad was great, because I'm assuming it frightened old people all over the country, both because of the brain-eating and the "TV on the internet" concept.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brian</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 10:55:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Super Bowl Ad Ratings</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/02/super-bowl-ad-ratings/#comment-5775752</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I would argue that the Hulu commercial should be considered the most successful, since it generated the most voting.  There's no such thing as bad publicity!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Yeh</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 10:52:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Super Bowl Ad Ratings</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/02/super-bowl-ad-ratings/#comment-5775704</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Seriously, did nobody like the CareerBuilder commercial but me?  Had me in stitches.  I even tweeted about it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kiril</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 10:50:02 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>