-
Website
http://avc.com/ -
Original page
http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2008/04/ten-questions-a.html -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
ShanaC
1239 comments · 73 points
-
daryn
216 comments · 15 points
-
kidmercury
835 comments · 104 points
-
howardlindzon
207 comments · 71 points
-
Charlie Crystle
205 comments · 36 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Top Tracks of 2009
14 hours ago · 49 comments
-
Top 10 Records Of 2009
1 day ago · 73 comments
-
Getting Computer Science Into Middle School
6 days ago · 281 comments
-
Open APIs and Open Standards
1 week ago · 207 comments
-
Thoughts on Blackberry Fail
4 days ago · 77 comments
-
Top Tracks of 2009
For me happiness is growth. If I am not growing, I am not happy. For me the entrepreneurial process has been a tremendous growth experience. I soberly realize that most startups never make it. And that's not enough to deter me from trying. Because it's been about the process more than anything. I had to build emotional strength to deal with uncertainty, I had to become better at balancing optimism while keeping in touch with reality. I had to become better at sales. I had to become better at communicating ideas of varying complexity in an exceedingly simple manner. As a person who hadn't touched technology until last year, I had to get out of my comfort zone and explore the unknown. I had to familiarize myself with the development process (front end and back end), enough to talk intelligently with my tech team and ensure that my dream turns into reality, and enough to get fascinated by it. I had to retrain my brain to see each "pain in the ass" problem as an opportunity. I had to learn how to put together financial statements. Oh and did I mention, I had to learn to live with uncertainty, and not just live with it, but revel in it? I had to learn how to look forward and not look back, except to analyze mistakes. Perhaps saying "had to learn" about all of these points is inaccurate, because I have only just started. Clearly I don't have the entrepreneurial experience to have fully developed any of these traits / behaviors. But one thing I know for sure, I am happy.
Long time fly on the wall, first time post. I have got to disagree with you on this:
Q: Can entrepreneurship be taught/learned?
A: I don't think so. It's like a personality disorder. You are born with it.
I disagree -- people can learn to take or balance risks as they get older.
Just my two cents,
Kamlesh
But asking if entrepreneurs are happy people is like asking whether rabbis are happy people, or nurses are happy people, or tennis players are happy people.
Hearing a calling (or at least searching for one) and realising one's potential at its fullest is what every human being strives for.
Believe it or not, entrepreneurs are human beings too :-)
Happy as a pig in muck.
Mihály Csíkszentmihályi describes a process "flow" - mindful engagement which effects brain chemistry in positive ways. Some people get it from running marathons, and some get it from running start-ups.
Regards,
Saurabh
http://www.goliexpress.com
Overall though, I wouldn't say entrepreneurs are happier than others, but I would say that they're typically happy...and they're MUCH happier than when they're working for someone else.
As an entrepreneur who has also been an employee, I'll over generalize and say "Yes." Typically, entrepreneurs become entrepreneurs because they are very passionate about creating something that can change the world(in a small or a big way). If successful, that can provide a lot of personal satisfaction and fulfillment.
As "Paul" stated, there a definitely "peaks and valleys" though ;)
It can't be cured, either... although it can be treated. :)
I've been involved with three startups now, two as a founder... one mild success, one dismal failure. And you know, even when it's been bad, I was happier than I'd ever been working in a company I didn't join in the startup phase. Why? The excitement of building something new is often part of it, but more than that, it's being the master of my own destiny. That's why I love the startup phase, but would (almost) just as soon get out of the way and let more experienced management take over once things get more established. I love the building, but the growing isn't as exciting (for me). To each his own, I guess.
Also, I do like your comment about 'personality disorder' - especially in context of the flawed thinking these days that anyone/everyone SHOULD go start a new company. Entrepreneurs are special folks with certain odd desires that aren't quite common.
Would Murdoch or Job be so good at being entrepreneurs if they weren't first passionate about newspapers or great consumer products? If you're passionate about your niche (it can be a big niche), you're happy, even if you're not smiling all the time.
On behalf of all visionaries, I demand an apology and retraction for calling us frustrated and angry, you elitist snob!!!!
so i would argue they are "happier than others" -- because a person actually can have control over fulfilling that desire; a person can mindfully put themselves into action and into risk and thrills
but the entrepreneurs "happiness" wouldn't feel like "happiness" to people who aren't entrepreneurs (or share their personalities), just like the joy that rollercoaster fans feel on rollercoasters may not feel so great to people who don't love wild rides
But you do have to "have what it takes" as they say -- the security of a J O B goes a long way to providing happiness, for some at least.
As for me, I'll always be an entrepreneur.
Entrepreneurs tend to have certain innate personality and character qualities that put them on a happiness roller coaster. We are rarely satisfied with our performance, successes, or even our abilities. It's the endless pursuit of empowerment, achievement, and constant learning that makes us happy. But because we are rarely, if ever, content with our current status in these areas (the endless pursuit), we never really achieve that blissful, long-term happiness everyone seems to so nonchalantly mention as the eventual norm in life. Yes, some may achieve it as their personalities and lifestyles are suited to it. But to me, I think my partner has a good point as far as entrepreneurs go.
So what's the next best thing to achieving that pie-in-the-sky happiness? Getting brief tastes of it all throughout your life that encourage you to keep on striving for it, even if you never experience it in that blissful, long-term manner. In the end, you'll only be better for it.
from my experience many entrepreneurs are happy somewhere between 2 and 3. being an entrepreneur is all about dealing with uncertainty. the more you can free yourself from worrying about it, the happier you are.
... until you get a restraining order
however, our changing living environment can change and affect our abilities and personalities. So I think entrepreneurship can be "taught" and "enlightened". I think everybody has different creative thinking and point of views that others may not come out with. when comes into entrepreneurship, it really depends on if he is willing to express his new ideas before others, abilities and opportunities to transit his new ideas into realities. Perhaps, there are several persons that have same ideas on google search engines but they did not have abilities(skill) or opportunities (time and money) to turns it into real. If you were born with your music talent, you did not learn and improve it, you may have less abilities and opportunities than others. Creating a new thing is important. more crucial, is that how you could maintain and develop it better and better.
Perhaps you should qualify entrepreneurship. Like Jay here, I'm not sure it's as black & white.
I know a lot of people who started their own business because they saw a chance to take their skills and clients to the next level. Ask them if they were "born" with it, and they'll likely answer that they have no idea.
Similarly, considering the numerous opportunities & education available for starting a business these days, there are people that wonder whether entrepreneurship is not just becoming another job, one for which some skills can be trained.
But I agree that something like passion can probably not be trained. Still, being "born" with it, seems like a strong statement.
I love being the master of my work. I've worked at large and small media companies and what's frustrating about companies is how many times people say "no" without good reason. Having/starting a startup there's a place where the "yes" can be accomplished. This process is a drug - and it's a tough drug to quit.
Why would anyone want to go back to the land where the irrational "no" lives?
Thanks
fred
The person focused on money is unhappy, the person who attains respect or wealth as a byproduct of Entrepreneur endeavers is happy.
99 percent of Entrepreneurs wanted to be free and became a hostage of their business, the other 1 percent found freedom.
Andy of HoboTraveler.com in Panjachel, Guatamala, Lago Atitlan looking at volcanoes and maybe I am working...
I have always wondered about being a woman and trying to be an entrepreneur, and I'd definitely like your perspective on it. I'm personally interested in the business of tech and one of my pie-in-the-sky goals/dreams is to be an entrepreneur and be able to pioneer a product or technological development and bring it to the marketplace. Of course, I'm still really young, just about to graduate college, so maybe I'm still allowed to have ridiculous ideas. (Not that entrepreneurship is ridiculous, but realistically, it is a rare opportunity for anyone...perhaps I'm too much of a realist to be an entrepreneur?...) I don't even know if I have the personality for being an entrepreneur, but I've always been on the lookout for examples of successful female entrepreneurs. Sadly, 99% of the ones I come across are NOT in the tech business. In fact, while it is somewhat heartening that many women are running their own businesses, I'm rather disheartened that these businesses are geared towards "woman things" - underwear, cosmetics, fashion, etc etc. I feel that the message is that women can of course succeed in business, if only they cater to the "woman's niche" in the market.
In thinking about why this is so, I have concluded that entrepreneurship has a very large social component to it, such as, the sharing of ideas, the ability to convey expertise and convey confidence to vc's or to others that you may be interested in working with. And let's face it, the tech world has yet to view men and women working in it as equals. And um, well, the simple fact is, whether they recognize their own ingrained prejudices or not, people are less likely to share ideas with you when you're the only woman in the room, trying to succeed in something as 'male' as tech. All in all, I get the feeling that it is far more frustrating for a woman trying to be a tech entrepreneur, and that getting attention for your ideas as a female tech entrepreneur is just all the more difficult. I would say the high frustration and difficulty is somewhat correlated with the low percentage of women deciding to study engineering and science in the first place. The reasons for both are very similar.
I will work on a post on this topic, but the one thing I want to say is that
someone has to break through and become the role model that others will
follow. There have been a few women who have had big successes as tech
entrepreneurs but not enough. Maybe you can be one of them.
Fred
One trade-off tech entrepreneurs have to live with is that often they may come across as unpleasant. Caring about your idea means that often you have to say/do things that run against social etiquette. In doing what is right for my company I have been called a jerk, egomaniac and what not, and that's just the way it is, you do not let it impact you and just keep plugging. Most women, in my view, care too much about how they are perceived socially and would sacrifice their passion out of a need to be "nice".
I think if someone has entrepreneurial tendencies they can be taught. I say this because I have taken and taught entrepreneurship classes at the college level at the UT Austin business school. The vast majority of students will never start their own businesses but the few who have and who will will use the tools, people, etc. presented in the class to make something happen whether before they graduate, soon after, 10 yrs out, or 50 yrs out. But they must have the spark, the desire, and be comfortable with the unknown.
Rather than a personality disorder I like to think of it as a different way of viewing the world, comfortable with chaos/ambuiguity, and feeling they can make a difference and finding creative ways (not just VC backed) to make it happen. A very small % of entrepreneurs take outside capital.
Sadly, as you said there are not many women entrepreneurs in the tech/web world and in my opinion it's because there are not many women VCs or investors. I strongly believe that people promote/uplift in their image (their comfort zone) and given the tech world is still dominated by men you won't see this change until there are more women involved. More VC firms need to take more risks by hiring more women regardless if their degree/training is in tech. Because when you say things like you advise entrepreneurs to acquire "technical and product skills" and most girls/women were not encouraged or not drawn to those fields at a young age you dismiss, in my opinion, a big reason why several start-ups make it (i.e., all the other stuff). Gates was technical but Microsoft would not have made it without the non-technical people who may not have been founders but were there early. Wozniak was technical and Jobs took the lead on the other stuff. I may get flamed for this but I believe men and women think differently and view the world differently. There are not enough business/investor mentors out there who get or are comfortable with how women think/strategize/take action, etc. so often we are forced to act like men which works for some but not for most.
As Gail Evans, former VP at CNN, says we all have one life and work is part of that life just like play so balance is what you make of it.
I think if an entrepreneur is comfortable listening to their internal drive and not being overly influenced by the hype/peer pressure, they can be happy. If you are doing it just for the money or fame, in the vast majority of the cases you will not be happy because the money won't come. Personally, I can run the full range of emotions on a daily basis but the more I pay attention to what's right for me and my family, the happier I am. As someone mentioned previously, this is not a black/white answer because it is like asking if doctors/nurses/sanitation worker/lawyers/mothers/parents are happier than others! I know some unhappy entrepreneurs, depressed mothers, happy mothers, miserable hairdressers, happy dental hygenists, etc.
In the tech world, we often lose site of the fact that there are much easier ways to make money and taking your time to do it right is not a bad thing. :-)
I think ultimately what I love most, what makes me keep at being an entrepreneur, is not that I am generally more happy, but that I think that the roller coaster is much more exciting. I think that the happiest moments that I have are worth the lowest lows. I would rather be on that roller coaster than on one that is more flatlined. Which seems more fun to you?
Chris
http://www.propertystampede.com
Currently reading Prophet of Innovation, bio on Joseph Schumpeter - the economist who coined the phrase creative destruction. I was very interested in reading the book, but dreaded the idea of a bio about an economist, however Thomas K. McCraw does an amazing job of making the story flow, entertain and educate.
Schumpeter also wrote some of the first theories on what motivates an entrepreneur - tying psychology and sociology into the economics of entrepreneurship. While his views have become the basis for what we know today the strength of his convictions and how well they do hold up today considering when and where he wrote them - it makes for a fascinating read on entrepreneurship.
1) Founder takes the CEO role. But many VC's would content that the #1 job of a CEO is to raise funding. This seems less than ideal. The founder will be distracted from focusing on product. Fundraising may also not be their strong suit. The founder could try to largely delegate fundraising to someone else on the management team, but this may raise a red flag among some VC's.
2) Founder brings on a CEO. This largely frees them from fundraising but now they have the drag of having to justify day to day decisions on product, budget and schedule. All of these may be areas where they trust themselves more than the CEO.
Would love to get your thoughts on this (and happy to flesh out the scenario if there's not enough information).
Forget whether the statistics are valid or not - it's just the principle.
Assume that 20% of the population would be happier as entrepreneurs, and 80% happier as employees.
Assume that 5% of the population are entrepreneurs, and 95% are employees.
I'm willing to believe that the employee pool is far more "diluted" with repressed entrepreneurs than the entrepreneur pool is diluted with wanabee employees who have fallen into entrepreneurship by accident.
Oh, and you can safely assume that I'm far happier as an entrepreneur, even when things are going badly, than I ever was as an employee :-)
But at the same time, the pursuit of betterment is fulfilling in and of itself. So it's probably a wash.