-
Website
http://avc.com/ -
Original page
http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/10/the-blog-where-everybody-knows-your-name.html -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
ShanaC
1228 comments · 73 points
-
daryn
213 comments · 14 points
-
kidmercury
829 comments · 104 points
-
howardlindzon
207 comments · 71 points
-
Charlie Crystle
205 comments · 35 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Thoughts on Blackberry Fail
12 hours ago · 66 comments
-
Getting Computer Science Into Middle School
2 days ago · 267 comments
-
End of Year Music Posts
1 day ago · 46 comments
-
How To Get Me To Hang Up On You
4 days ago · 158 comments
-
Open APIs and Open Standards
5 days ago · 207 comments
-
Thoughts on Blackberry Fail
Most of us who do not know Fred personally start leaving comments to have a direct conversation with Fred, to build a relationship over time and potentially work together when the right situation arises. The volume of comments is so high here because Fred participates and responds to as many comments as he can. So all the readers feel that their comments are valued, and continue to leave comments. And then after a while people who leave comments start to read all the other readers comments rather than only Fred's response to their own comments. :) And then magic happens. you realize that there are a number of people who consistently leave comments and you start to recognize them. And then you start to communicate with the other readers who leave comments and there you have a bar (oops i meant a community)
Better we pipe in, and say "pass us another round of drinks bartender" and raise our glasses to salute Fred. I think an actual meetup/party would be fun. I just missed bumping into Fred at Hugh and Seth's Purple Cow party and that was a blast (and I didn't know anyone there).
As mentioned in numerous posts, USV regards the existence of a community around a product/service as a key competitive advantage. By creating his own community, Fred is essentially practicing what he preaches.
The role of Disqus is also important: "Turning comments into communities" (just made that up, but it has a nice ring to it...)
In a very real way tools like Disqus and comments help us all get a little smarter by tuning into perspectives outside our own. Fred see's things differently than Dave, who see's things differently than Shana, etc. All these perspectives on interesting questions/concerns about value and proper methods help shake out the unessential aspects of ideas, revealing good ole raw truthiness. Now I need to think about that statement some more, thanks for getting my weary noggin' going this AM.
You should add some color for the younger readers, e.g., Queen's "Another One Bites The Dust" was in heavy rotation, Tron was on the big screen, the nation's gamers hadn't gotten tired of Pong yet...
Don't take it too seriously, It's Scav Hunt. They don't actually do this on a day to day basis.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Chic...
http://scavhunt.uchicago.edu/
I suspect that study needs to be redone. The reason is that since the underlying technology of the web has gotten better, I suspect the nodal points of where people interlink in and out to have gotten tighter and looser at the same time, so now it is more web like. If we Take Freds blog to be a node, having Disqus or some other non-one to one parity social networking tool installed could easily cause someone to link out more quickly since the page is now much more link rich.
So even if we all end up here, and are very tight knit here, because we are easily accessible through Disqus to other locations it is totally possible that we've more firmly joined even on a link by link basis. (I've been overthinking this point for a while in relation to some other thoughts.)
Google's breakthrough information mapping was counting links, real time information quality doesn't have time to develop links, so we require other measures. Every time I follow a link, some part of me feels like I'm strengthening a neural connection of some super smart but as of yet non-existent entity. Our usage of the Internet "teaches it" by making direct connections between abstract concepts. Loosely we train the neural network of the web. Crowd sourcing sites do this with votes, social sites do with likes, and twitter does it with retweets.
The further strides we make in building the Internet's depth, by making it a richer experience, the greater we are rewarded. It's a feedback loop. The more I improve Internet usage efficiency, by adding useful services, the richer I become. The intelligence of the Internet isn't an isolated entity either, it's composed of a billion or so people actively using it, generating and connecting content. Our attention, and shared time and thoughts here are changing the structure of the web in a real way.
Look at what became of traditional advertising, Google's 20billion dollar plus revenue stream didn't come from no where, it came directly out of the pockets of traditional advertising, which was a lot bigger market than 20 billion dollars. So Google shrunk the industry, and captured the revenue - classic disruption.
20 minutes mid afternoon gives me a second wind
"I wonder whether any other generation has seen such astounding revolutions of data and values as those through which we have lived. Scarcely anything material or established which I was brought up to believe was permanent and vital, has lasted. Everything I was sure or taught to be sure was impossible, has happened."
What a man. That one's definitely going on my home-office wall.
My 3 daughters taught me the value of the nap.
The key for me with the nap is I don't sleep for more than 20 mins during the week because I'm groggy after I wake up if I go for the 40min variety
What worries me is in 10 years when they are 17, 15, and 12.
Interested in your thoughts on Google and shrinking and disrupting the ad industry and how interactive TV technologies could do some of this as well. Have any links to point me to?
Here's a telling quote from the article: "Even as companies pared marketing budgets, Google benefited from a shift to online ads from traditional media. Search advertising will grow 3.6 percent in the U.S. this year, while the entire ad industry declines 15 percent, according to Magna Global in New York."
This is somewhat counter online advertising, but I like Eric Clemons' style: Why Advertising is Failing on the Internet. For interactive tv look to boxee, hulu, netflix and other providers that give viewers the freedom to pick their media and create their own personalized stations. I'm not sure how popular the ad model versus pay to play will be though.
Love, love, love Disqus. Just wish Posterous would integrate it in to their platform as Tumblr has done.
Counter to all of this is that this blog is just a great place for learning and for discourse on technology. So anyone anywhere would want to just jump in =) The fact that Fred responds to comments welcomes people from anywhere to participate and feel connected.
PS: Chris Dixon might be able to replicate Fred's success if he continues what he is doing now. :) The community that comments is small right now but i think there are a lot of us sitting on the side lines to see if Chris will commit to the community long term, and if he does then a lot of us will get in and it will flourish.
the question is can he sustain it
andreessen could not
jdawg hustles though, so you can't rule him out and have to give props in that sense. hustlers can succeed in spite of many, many obstacles.
I live in Los Angeles. AVC is one of my daily reads, though I'd likely never approach USV and/or Fred for an an investment opportunity. My focus is mostly content distribution for " traditional" media (music/film) and the impact of technology on that industry. When I'm not involved in the digital media wars, I'm focused on "dual-use" or transition of Gov't research projects to the commercial sector.
You can check my posting history (via Disqus) to see that I rarely agree with Fred regarding his opinions on creative content distribution via the interwebs.
What I enjoy about this blog is:
• Fred's engagement and honesty. He's opinionated, yet will readily admit when he's uninformed or incorrect on a particular topic. Most important -- no drama.
• Fred is enthusiastic about technology and it's uses; as another commenter noted "Fred eats his own dog food".
• Fred writes well. Even his most complex discussions of the economics of the VC industry are easy to follow.
• Fred has a great sense of humor, and is also genuinely committed to the "public good".
AVC is my third blog read every morning. I'm often awake before start of business in NYC, so I check what Fred is up to in the wee hours here in Los Angeles. I track the comments for topics in my area of interest, and comment when I have something to add to the conversation, whether or not Fred, or the rest of his blog community will agree with me.
disagree with me on some of my most strongly held beliefs
Well, Panto' season is approaching ... ;-)
1. fred wilson
2. heather armstrong (dooce.com)
3. kottke
4. jdawg (gotta admit it....you know i don't run from the truth boss)
5. mike masnick
6. dave winer
7. kanye west
8. richard macmanus
9. om malik
10. mike shedlock (globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com)
and that's off the top of my head; there are many others (regrettably mikey must be included, although as we know, he doesn't know how to play the game....if you're feeling charitable boss could you toss him a few pointers on how this blog game is played....after you whup his ass in the donor's choose contest, of course).
to clarify, blog stars can simply be defined as independent media creators/publishers who have created and continue to engage their own niche community. because of the influence they hold over the community, they will have the assets required to crowdsource labor and to make endorsements. their relationship with their fans, if managed properly, can enable P2P transactions as well. it is critical to note that when evaluating the potential profitability of a blog star, we need to consider not only the quality of the content they produce, but their governance/political skills as well, as their influence must be used to manage/lead/inspire the crowd.
there will be many blog stars in the near future, as blog stars are the epitome of the "power to the people" nature of the internet. you're on the cutting edge of a new trend, boss!
1) The subject Fred posts are relevant to me, and for the most part I feel his sentiment on the issues surrounding innovation, community, giving, and business in general echo my own
2) The people who contribute to the discussion add value for me (more networks, contacts and twitter followers) as well as other angles on the thread
3) I perceive a sense of genuineness and passion from Fred. I say "perceive" because it's all about perception; "perception is the reality". By posting regularly and by commenting to the comments Fred demonstrates a passion for this (or at least I perceive it that way) and without knowing Fred very well personally, I'm totally sure this is the case. Personally, I am drawn to people who are passionate about things. I don't sense this is just a commmercial opportunity for him, although I'm sure there are commercial benefits (and so there should be too!).
This is a BIG lesson for any Entrepreneur trying to build a business or community or to any VC trying to maintain a blog (and hopefully find his next home-run). You got to:
1) Make your content meaningful (say something intelligent or controversial or don't say anthing at all)
2) Be visible, be accessible, be out there and be relevant
3) be passionate and be genuine about what you do
4) Speak the truth (at all times, even if what you believe goes against the grain)
5) Engage your audience, ask questions, story tell
and most importantly...................,
BE A HELPER!
2- Fred: You should have a meetup or an unconference. It would be fun and enlightening.
choose via this blog
i know that is not what you are talking about but its a first step
but i will set the date soon and blog about it
won't be doing that unfortunately
them
Is that the equivalent of "hi everybody, just stopped to say hi, but won't be able to have a drink with you today".
Speaking of drinks, there's something about Fred's blog that goes to people's heads, so it is like a bar. Actually, the food and decor are good too. :)
the last step of the equation is for the united states to be weakened, as there can be no superpower if there is to be a true world government. we are in the midst of that process unfolding.
Kookism or kookist would be the dogma of kookiness.
but an excellent point you raise, and certainly one that merits discussion.
9/11 was an inside job,
kid mercury
yesterday
Besides I was dissing on Kid's kooky conspiracy theory early, but loving his crowd sourced private venture party idea.
But kid has created great defense mechanisms surrounding his vision of truth, who am I to pick (seriously he has studied and looked much more into the details of his conspiracies than I have). If I believed what Kid did, I'd have to start a witch hunt, to route out all those involved, and I'm way too lazy ;)
Howdy gents :D
You capture it perfectly in this line: "...but it's fun and everyone is respectful and you learn a lot," So true! And for this, I too am very thankful (and also why it was so important to me to give something to your donors choose challenge, despite being on a 'start up' budget-- though I'm certain I'm not the only reader of this blog who is! :)
If it's a bar, who is the bouncer? It's a crowdsourced bouncer I'd argue as everyone is exposed at all times.
i appointed him to the position when Jackson (my brother) stopped coming
regularly
he was the first bouncer and was amazing at watching my back
this blog has been flat at about 125k UVs per month for years
i think it has a natural limit
What has been created here is actually quite extraordinary and an interesting phenomenom. I think it is the almost anonymous wrestling of "ideas" stripped bare of the normal "learned" reactions with which we color our view of the sponsors of the ideas. It allows one to focus on the ideas without any preconceived notions. It is quite liberating.
I find it quite interesting to see how far geographically these ideas are cast and how democratic the marketplace appears to be. In addition, the mix of ages provides an interesting flavor to things.
In another sense, it is also the "anarchy" created by the anonymity of the medium which opens our minds to the possibilities. As an example, when I read the Kid's rants I am forced to give them careful consideration because he has such keen and valuable (and in my view usually correct) insights on other subjects with which I agree.
There is also something charming about having a "bouncer" for a blog as one of my greatest regrets in life is the abolition of dueling.
This blog has taken on the civilized characteristics of a "salon" in which the entry price is a thoughtful observation of the world, the human condition and the ability to share ideas and views in conflict but without being contentious.
Fred is the guy who has made this happen and here's a tip of the hat to the old boy!
I will be glad to host the Austin, TX meet up if it should come to that. Tex Mex or BBQ?
See ya in Dallas Saturday morning at 11:00 AM --- TX v OU --- Hook 'em, Horns! My 29th TX v OU game in a row!
that would be the line of the day
"This happened, that happened, do you remember when..."
In that situation I'd feel like I really missed something special and there's nothing I could do to go back and put myself in the mix. Well yesterday there was an awesome conversation here, it was very similar to an epic night out, and I missed it. :( I can't get that back. (I'll read through today, but it's not the same)
It really is an intelligent and entertaining community here. Everyone involved is better off for it. I've met 5 or so people offline strictly because I saw their names and faces in comments and on MyBlogLog over and over. Pretty epic.
one of the things i been meaning to pitch you on fred is the idea of creating more of a community with social network type stuff. i don't think a blog alone can truly leverage the full value of the community -- value being defined in both the utility sense (i.e. knowledge being shared, friendships made, etc) and the monetary sense (takin' it to the bank and then bragging about it on your blog). i think a more social CMS of sorts is needed. my trading site and my kook blog are examples of what i had i mind as this is something i am working on.
i will pitch you on this again when i have the content management system that can itnegrate all your portfolio companies (i..e use disqus for comments, twitter integration, etc), then i can be like "damn boss you gotta do it for the sake of your portfolio." but i was thinking we could import all the blog feeds of the members we trust into their own blog here on your site. you can then subscribe to whoever you want and create your own RSS reader of folks you follow on the AVC community. we can pull in other feeds and create our own news community. this would be the foundation for doing cooler things in the future, like integrating social games and a building a useful and fun reputation system. after all, where else are folks like DaveinHackensack, Mark Essel, ShanaC, Andy Swan and so many others going to play 9/11 truth games with their good buddy Kid Mercury?
this would also be a good way to extend the bouncer storyline (i.e. like if i built you a club, i really would be the bouncer). this is very important.
such a community could also lead to a whole bunch of additional benefits for USV. wouldn't take much more than a bulletin board, preferably one modded to pull and integrate the APIs of your portfolio companies, so that you can make bank and laugh at everyone else who isn't.
anyway, something to think about. fred i will pitch you on it again more seriously when i can integrate all your portfolio companies. unless there is real interest in doing it now. but you guys probably lack the community spirit needed to make it happen. OR DO YOU?????
know if it is a good idea but then someone would have to build it first
no worries/no pressure if you hate it and think it is stupid/unfeasible.
i will take it slowly, but i should have something to show you in a couple weeks.
Kudos to you and the regulars for sustaining a stimulating forum where most of the discourse is pretty robust. And thanks for being inclusive.
Update: As it turns out, he was in Toronto to receive an Honorary degree of Law from York University. http://toronto.ctv.ca/servlet/an/local/CTVNews/...
afterthought, I shld have taken a picture. I said hi Woody, and he
said hi buddy.
1 of ur 125,000 readers ran into a Cheers actor on the day of that
post. That's the extent of your audience reach.
I bet you could tap your audience for some meaningful surveying or a quick poll widget...just a thought.
afterthought, I shld have taken a picture. I said hi Woody, and he
said hi buddy.
1 of ur 125,000 readers ran into a Cheers actor on the day of that
post. That's the extent of your audience reach.
Mi Tierra is my favorite San Antone Tex Mex life support station and I have had the fajitas and a tequila or two in the third booth.
The karma circle is closing.
but the simplest answer to "who killed jfk?" is the CIA (or more precisely, a division within the CIA). the new world order is a more correct answer in my opinion, but that's too kooky for most folks. if you say CIA, you basically tell the same story in a more believable fashion, and can provide more proof (like confessions from CIA agents).
And then the magic happens when the fans start loving the other fans -- and they become fans of the experience, not just Fred (or the band or church). The local bar metaphor resonates with me. First you go for the beer, the ambiance, the music. But eventually you go for the community.
You did it even better
i realize its a guess, but how exactly do you calculate that number? seems kind of large?
Of course I am defining regular loosely
Whilst cafe culture is very pleasant, it just doesn't cut it regarding lively banter.
I mean, can you imagine these Sheffield music greats (below) shooting the breeze over a latte?
http://www.therealmckee.co.uk/galleries/22-view...
;-)
FYI, a new Sheffield Wednesday community has just gone online. Nice design:
http://www.ourwednesday.com/
Kick off soon - we badly need a win today - we started the season well but have lost momentum of late.
Up The Owls!
Aye, TV coverage - especially internationally - is frustrating. Will be easier when we are back in the Premiership, though! ;-)
In meantime, if you can - ahem - bypass non-UK country of origin, the regularly updated highlights on the BBC are very good:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/...
PS, we've just gone one nil up after just a few minutes!
Fred this is an important point and I think the following elements are in play:
- bdfl: benevolent dictator for life means good policing
- identity: contributors are known so reputation counts
- culture enforces good behaviour
- intelligence and positive behaviour is rewarded not bad behaviour
In any online community the deficiencies in any 4 means discussion degrades. One thing that might skew this is if the community increases to the point identity becomes a problem.
The reason he closed the comments is that he got so many of them that he was not able anymore to address the 5% commenters with "flaws in logic" http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2006/06...