-
Website
http://avc.com/ -
Original page
http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/11/the-donors-choose-threepeat-is-complete.html -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
ShanaC
1228 comments · 73 points
-
daryn
213 comments · 14 points
-
kidmercury
829 comments · 104 points
-
howardlindzon
207 comments · 71 points
-
Charlie Crystle
205 comments · 35 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Thoughts on Blackberry Fail
12 hours ago · 66 comments
-
Getting Computer Science Into Middle School
2 days ago · 267 comments
-
End of Year Music Posts
1 day ago · 46 comments
-
How To Get Me To Hang Up On You
4 days ago · 158 comments
-
Open APIs and Open Standards
5 days ago · 207 comments
-
Thoughts on Blackberry Fail
guess what? soon anyone will be able to specify relevance;
suredone prototype beta v0.1 http://motorcycleparts2u.com
my only purpose is to build a company that develops several different internet technologies.
in the meantime Fred, i am humble for any of your time and wisdom.
Fred's community building and real-time meeting are perhaps a sidekick benefit of the Donor's program, but these are symbiotic and well done.
I just wanted to know if Kid will be standing at the door, or he gets the evening off as bouncer? lol...:)
Donor's Choose is the nextgen version of this sort of activism. You read about the project (from among several), learn about the recipients, and even get to interact with the people - I was thanked twice for my donation by the teacher who was looking to raise money for a projector. Of course there is stuff like Twitter and FB integration.
Good stuff. Have a great meetup!
As for your numbers, Well we know you seem to have a top off point of readers, the better question is what is going on with those readers via income and demographics that can push the number higher. Or get you more readers, or both. We just have to figure out why your numbers are your numbers. What did you do differently? What was externally differently?
Further- I think actually doing these sorts of analyses would be helpful not only to donor's choose, and also be very helpful to knowing who is reading the blog, why they choose to read or click on something, buy something, do something on the web, and what is the background causes. Really could reshape if we throw out normal assumptions and run test cases on ourselves. But that's just me. I think your blog personally is a early warning sign of a lot of web things. Also a just me thing.
All totally possible in my book. I believe in growth. Always. You have the number...
I'm nerdy enough for the tech discussions. I like it for some reason. But I also love shoes. And I have a passion for fun stockings and bright nail polish, much to the chagrin of my friends in conservative jobs (and I refuse to change, I think it's important to have personality when you dress).
Here you see golf and I pass. It's a real macho atmosphere. I expect that your office and a lot of tech places are similar. I'm never going to get that. I'm ok with that. A lot of women are not. We're gendered. I was raised to respect the gender line. Guys need to be guyish. I'm not, and I don't really want to be.
Writing for a gender neutral audience is difficult, because it's about how do you appeal across two sometimes very different mindsets, especially when they compete in very different worlds, and in very different ways. There are a bunch of articles floating around right now about "VC gender Gap" I suspect that some of it is that women think different about career goals and career planning, about how a work environment should be like, and what counts as competitive and successful; I've been tracking some of them. To get women to come here, you are going to have to come to heads to heads about why women choose certain professions, and what their concerns are that are holding them back, and what that does for the men in the same professions. it's a really frightening discussion for everyone involve- since it implies massive social upheaval about the meaning of basic gender roles.
In the interim: I'm going call out some really locker room like behavior. For those women who choose to come, you are very welcome here. I'll be perfectly happy to have you in my clique of girly only things while the guys do the guy stuff that I will never fully understand.
You'll be distressted to know it involves hunch
Considering that right now I don't have any relationship with them beyond pundit and applicant. I've got no fear.
Smart users understand the internal game economy. They're also the most monetizable when it comes to qactual purchases of anything. "We the nerds" and all.
They also know, as explained to me here, and by actual USERS!!!! that it isn't worth it. They know that playing for fuel in Farmville won't get them along any faster in the game, really. Same with mafia wars. It passes the time. Real strategy is semi-abset, or absent enough that I can have all these games explained to me in 20 minutes flat. And that there are game guides floating around on the internet.
(This is the joy of being a college student who is a size 0-4 in a Zynga shirt, people will actually explain you stuff if you asked politely and explain why)
They also know the offers will not add any benefit in their lives they either cannot get elsewhere- or get cheaper. So wrong aim. I once asked one person if there was in game communication or teamwork- not fully, or not to an extent where it was clearly neccessary. This is to Zynga's et all disadvantage as Viral Games- they are not played as groups, or clearly played as groups. Even if you are on a team, it is your facebook friends- in no way do the games force you to make contact with them in order to game strategic advantage, or to force a purchase. No one has to talk to each other to coordinate to do well if they so choose, including if they want to purchase.
The only reason I mention this, because it was explictly mentioned to me, by users, that the reason that they think people buy stuff is Bling for themselves and for gifts. or to One up. Even though right now they are proof of concept of virtual goods, they have to figure out under what situations people will buy- and it has to be one that pushed by a community to get some greater reward. Until the games are very communally oriented, it will be very hard.
@ Zynga if you find this, I really do believe in games. Push yourself hard. Be strong.
Still, as with all Mass media on the web that gets to a critical mass point- it obey's my new law.
It links at a rate of n^n rate, though it may be more now. He's not only a Locus point of distrubution, where his work obey Reed's Law, since he is considered a central point of (albeit bad) news, but also one where it obeys Sarnoff's Law, since it is distrubtory news placed in a Linked environment.
It moves extremely quickly if it is a hot spot. Fred, to quote Mcluhan
as for what's cooler than educating kids, well, 9/11 truth, of course! besides, once kids are educated in that, they will have all the knowledge they need to fix the problems their ancestors handed them.
Congrats!
And your note about increasing the # of participants is interesting, too...it seems like the Meetup incentive really drove that metric. Really cool idea for layering more game dynamics on top of the Challenge.
Next year we should do something wacky with the DChoose API + the SMC!
We'll have to have a brainstorm on that one ;-)