<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>A VC - Latest Comments in The End Of The IPO Drought Is Coming</title><link>http://avc.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://avc.disqus.com/the_end_of_the_ipo_drought_is_coming/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:28:52 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The End Of The IPO Drought Is Coming</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/05/the-end-of-the-ipo-drought-is-coming/#comment-11904153</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Renaissance Capital offers some insight into how to get the IPO market moving again...&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.renaissancecapital.com/ipohome/Review/HealingIPOs.aspx" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.renaissancecapital.com/ipohome/Review/HealingIPOs.aspx"&gt;http://www.renaissancecapit...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MLM</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:28:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The End Of The IPO Drought Is Coming</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/05/the-end-of-the-ipo-drought-is-coming/#comment-9338620</link><description>&lt;p&gt;great points regrading the potential of IPO's coming back sooner rather the later, I hope you are right!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mo</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 19:28:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The End Of The IPO Drought Is Coming</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/05/the-end-of-the-ipo-drought-is-coming/#comment-9117553</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think the buyers want to own stocks that will make them money, plain and simple&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There is the issue of small caps and floats&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I don't have a good answer for that&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I-banks that are focused on this oppty can help but its not the primary issue in my opinion&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 00:07:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The End Of The IPO Drought Is Coming</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/05/the-end-of-the-ipo-drought-is-coming/#comment-9102512</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think this is because of a CSS conflict with this page. Taking a look now... thanks!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">obscurelyfamous</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 14:25:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The End Of The IPO Drought Is Coming</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/05/the-end-of-the-ipo-drought-is-coming/#comment-9100602</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Fred, at institutional level, is a stronger effort required by i-banks to market IPOs or more so that buyers need to roll up sleeves give more consideration to these opportunities.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ventureblogalist</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 13:20:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The End Of The IPO Drought Is Coming</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/05/the-end-of-the-ipo-drought-is-coming/#comment-9054937</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree. That's why I listed ebitda and income multiples&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think 15-20x current year is about the same as 12-15x forward if it’s a growth company&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 10:03:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The End Of The IPO Drought Is Coming</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/05/the-end-of-the-ipo-drought-is-coming/#comment-9052064</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Negotiated between major shareholders and the underwriter, disclosed in the prospectus. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 08:20:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The End Of The IPO Drought Is Coming</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/05/the-end-of-the-ipo-drought-is-coming/#comment-9051951</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"overblown and largely discredited fees structures"  Huh?  Banks don't make any money on technology related IPO's - at least those below $75MM.  They used to make it up on having proprietary knowledge about trading flows, but that game is dead with decimalization.   &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 08:13:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The End Of The IPO Drought Is Coming</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/05/the-end-of-the-ipo-drought-is-coming/#comment-9051890</link><description>&lt;p&gt;15 to 20 X earnings?  That is highly optimistic.  Much more realistic is 12 to 15x forward earnings IF the company has 3 or more quarters of operating profits AND is growing at 20 to 30% per year in a sustainable fashion.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;People need to focus on profits, not revenue if you want an IPO market back.  The old, tried and true metric was 3 quarters of operating profit with operating income in the double digits as a percent of revenue. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 08:10:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The End Of The IPO Drought Is Coming</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/05/the-end-of-the-ipo-drought-is-coming/#comment-9051136</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There are signs: changeyou and rosetta stone and hopefully open table. Being first is not always best so I don't think we'll see a rush&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 07:10:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The End Of The IPO Drought Is Coming</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/05/the-end-of-the-ipo-drought-is-coming/#comment-9050922</link><description>&lt;p&gt;They (disqus) need to package that 'embed this comment thread" functionality better and make it easier to find and do&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 06:51:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The End Of The IPO Drought Is Coming</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/05/the-end-of-the-ipo-drought-is-coming/#comment-9050853</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Its not a legal issue. We just need to agree as an industry and do it. Lack of leadership and creative thinking at the nvca is unfortunate&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 06:46:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The End Of The IPO Drought Is Coming</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/05/the-end-of-the-ipo-drought-is-coming/#comment-9033954</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Fred,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I especially agree with your point 4, that investors are going to "look for simple businesses, products they can understand, balance sheets with cash and not much else, and growth without leverage".&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We've been beguiled too often by smoke and mirrors - its time to return to basic business principles no matter what industry the company being evaluated may operate in.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kevin Cimring</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 20:43:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The End Of The IPO Drought Is Coming</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/05/the-end-of-the-ipo-drought-is-coming/#comment-9023650</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have to agree - regardless of how cheap and easy it is to start a business these days - it does require some outside push to really take it to that perfect level.  Usually as a company starts to realize significant revenue - it just goes right out the door as it cannot keep up with development or innovation or even the founders sucking out the cash.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Althought I do like the idea of having many different companies doing what one big company does today - e.g. I rather have 20 different Fords then just one really big Ford.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Regarding the IPO market - two thoughts - Do you really see signs or are you just hopeful?  If the window does open, will there be a mad dash and will the first ones there (not necessarily the best one) get the cash?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joseph Lizio</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 15:15:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The End Of The IPO Drought Is Coming</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/05/the-end-of-the-ipo-drought-is-coming/#comment-9012097</link><description>&lt;p&gt;True, and it often doesn't create adequate returns.  This is particularly true for the common shareholders after all of the preferences have been cleared on a smaller transaction.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ronkornfeld</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 09:46:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The End Of The IPO Drought Is Coming</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/05/the-end-of-the-ipo-drought-is-coming/#comment-9011975</link><description>&lt;p&gt;some things like the 'like' and 'report' buttons are not working for me.&lt;br&gt;but most of the functionality seems to be doing good.   it's a good idea that comments travel together with the original article and without having to create yet another account on this website (posting from Silicon Alley Insider).&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">vruz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 09:42:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The End Of The IPO Drought Is Coming</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/05/the-end-of-the-ipo-drought-is-coming/#comment-9011173</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Is changing lockups a matter of legislation or a customized legal doc you agree upon as a VC or startup?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Essel</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 09:08:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The End Of The IPO Drought Is Coming</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/05/the-end-of-the-ipo-drought-is-coming/#comment-9010986</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If you're asking me, I'd say it is already ;)&lt;br&gt;I'd wager students following your blog actively (commenting, reblogging) for a semester would gain AT LEAST as much information as they would in 2 MBA courses.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And they'd have better retention of the material and greater understanding as well.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Essel</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 09:00:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The End Of The IPO Drought Is Coming</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/05/the-end-of-the-ipo-drought-is-coming/#comment-9010766</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i think VC lockups should be restructured.  make them 2-3 year lockup agreements with something like 20% being released each 6 months from the data of the IPO. then you'd get the VCs thinking like public market investors and not sellers dying to get out&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 08:51:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The End Of The IPO Drought Is Coming</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/05/the-end-of-the-ipo-drought-is-coming/#comment-9010661</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i've said this in other parts of this comment system, but services that are social and scale require large investments in "environmental remediation and governance"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 08:47:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The End Of The IPO Drought Is Coming</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/05/the-end-of-the-ipo-drought-is-coming/#comment-9010634</link><description>&lt;p&gt;leaving a comment at Alley Insider to prove to my friends that this is the same comment thread currently running at AVC&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 08:45:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The End Of The IPO Drought Is Coming</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/05/the-end-of-the-ipo-drought-is-coming/#comment-9010142</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why can't this blog be an online unoiversity?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 08:17:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The End Of The IPO Drought Is Coming</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/05/the-end-of-the-ipo-drought-is-coming/#comment-9010085</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That 'farm system' model is alive and well but I think we've become too reliant upon it&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 08:13:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The End Of The IPO Drought Is Coming</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/05/the-end-of-the-ipo-drought-is-coming/#comment-9010073</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, yes, yes&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Valuing these businesses reasonably and setting the proper expectations for growth and earning power is important&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I also think lockups should be structured differently. Instead of letting everyone out in 180 days, we ought to break it up in fifths and let everyone free for 20pcnt every six months&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 08:12:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The End Of The IPO Drought Is Coming</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/05/the-end-of-the-ipo-drought-is-coming/#comment-9010072</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great comment&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Great example&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 08:12:25 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>