-
Website
http://avc.com/ -
Original page
http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/06/the-leap-of-faith.html -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
ShanaC
1239 comments · 73 points
-
daryn
216 comments · 15 points
-
kidmercury
835 comments · 104 points
-
howardlindzon
207 comments · 71 points
-
Charlie Crystle
205 comments · 36 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Top Tracks of 2009
14 hours ago · 49 comments
-
Top 10 Records Of 2009
1 day ago · 73 comments
-
Getting Computer Science Into Middle School
6 days ago · 281 comments
-
Open APIs and Open Standards
1 week ago · 207 comments
-
Thoughts on Blackberry Fail
4 days ago · 77 comments
-
Top Tracks of 2009
When founding new models or businesses, the team has to decide how much risk the company should take. One can make safe bets that would be easier on the team and their families, but way less fun. And the investors are part of the team in that respect.
If people were only rational in their business behavior, machines could replace them. I don't believe that will happen. We are all in business to create value, experience, making process sustainable and better. And for that, human instinct is crucial.
When Zemanta was founded we viewed that people created content every day throughout the history of mankind. 50 years ago, the content started to be stored in an electronic form, 15 years ago it started to be connected by links, 5 years from now content creation will became a flow ubiquitous to us as is spell checking today. We'll be thinking about the information we want to convey and not the ways we want to convey it.
Ales Spetic, Zemanta CEO
At this point my two biggest concerns are social change: guiding folks both young and old to finding work they love to be most productive, and social development improvements: cobbling together a social design tool that will open up varied ways of innovating beyond modern methods of collaboration (google wave may entice me).
Besides it's too much fun having a few hours, a few days a week, to read, write, and comment about developing ideas, fantastic new trends and opportunities. I'm afraid I'd miss out on the wider view, by spearheading one surface boundary of future social tech.
But I don't see what that's any different than any venture with sufficient innovation behind it. Evangelism is part of the job, as is creating/finding a way to get money flowing in.
I have worked in both "back stabbing" and team building environments. The former was prisonlike, the latter exhilarating!
Great topic...
I still love my portfolio ... kind of like I would still love my kids after they blew their tuition in Vegas...
When you evaluate a complex decision, the problem space is immense. You evaluate visible, important factors explicitly, but I also believe that you take in and evaluate a vast amount of background information that never consciously enters the evaluation, but rather becomes part of your unconscious evaluation. With every bit of information you gather, I believe you assign (at some level) a degree of confidence in that data, as well.
Decisions you make aren't just driven by new facts, of course -- you're also factoring everything you've ever learned about subjects related to whatever you're evaluating, and probably some things you don't even realize are related. To some extent, you're aware of this synthesis; you surely compare new investment opportunities to other experiences you've had to help assess the new opportunity. But again, I believe that this activity is iceberg-like in nature: much of the synthesis that an effective analyst makes is happening beneath the waves.
The sum total of this unconscious decision fabric is greater than any "rational" analysis. We can call this "gut feel" or a "leap of faith", but I'm certain there's a foundation in grey matter that makes these decisions better than a roll of the dice.
So, a good VC in my opinion will see things that others haven't yet.
As for Leaps of Faith in general: I'm reading Emotional Design by Donald Norman right now. One of the central points of his thesis is that we actually can't make logical decisions without being emotionally involved. We can actually influence those decisions through design and through the functions of our environment. Which is why art and design can be so reactionary (in positive and negative ways, the way it should be- one his examples is that you want people stressed out to a specific point in a nuclear plant when there is an emergency, so you should design in specific kinds of stressors for emergencies.).
Isn't leaps of faith, the feeling of reaction, of wonder to the world, a great and awe inspiring thing? We actually don't know fully why we react the way we do- we just do, and it changes over time. But it is the most important part about being human. We actually are paralyzed from decision making and creativity without it. You just know. Because you react to what is within. To be more practiced in that!
I see Zemanta as a great tool for organizing thoughts better. These types of "recommendations" really improve quality of information sources. Do you see anyone doing good work in improving the organization of information sources based on personal interests? That space is really interesting given the tremendous amount of user-generated content on the web.
Thank you for the post on leaps of faith. It is leaps of faith that lead us to greatness and inspires us young entrepreneurs to not follow the "rules" of an industry. It has left me grinning from ear to ear.
http://www.fastcompany.com/blog/gadi-amit/new-d...
In my work, I'm constantly struggling to both institutionalize capital-i Innovation, and still leave room for intuition to flourish - i.e.: leaps of faith.
Since you invest in early stage companies, I'm curious have you ever taken a leap of faith and invested in just an idea? Or do you wait for a prototype? Or for a beta product? etc.
What criteria do you use for determining timing?
I'm surprised no one has followed up yet on this line about religion. Can you explain more? Why do you do it if you don't believe in it or don't have faith in it?
I'd love for you, when you have free time ;-), to take the same disruption principles you are applying to School as the system of Education and try it out on Religion as the system for Spirituality.
Signing of agreements and a leap of faith
Once you've had all the discussions, played out all the scenarios in your head, done the due diligence, then there's only one step left to make, and that's the leap of faith.
The other data I think they'd be smart to provide to bloggers is "common posts" - something that while you are typing is showing you other blogs that have touched the same subject. Maybe they could work a deal to repackage and VAR Buzz Logic at a retail level.
Could Disqus use Zemanta?
Here's the link: http://steveblank.com/2009/06/05/faith-based-ve...
Somewhere one starts trusting the team so deeply that it makes the entire process (of taking the plunge) easier..
Your essay reminds me of Hebrews:
"Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen." (Hebrews 11:1).
There was a small, 5'5 woman, named Jessica, who bet $1000 to her friends that she will make 10 out of 10 3 pointers in the local basketball court. The two friends had PhD in Statistics and they quickly calculated, that the probability of Jessica making 10 out of 10 was very slim. They figured out this could be easy money and accepted the challenge. 5 minutes later, they were shocked to see Jessica scoring 10 out of 10. They thought that this is one in a million event and cursed their luck. What they didn't know was that for the past 10 year, Jessica practiced her 3 points shooters every day for at least two hours. What seemed like a low probability event in the eyes of her friends, was actually a good investment with high expectancy for Jessica.
http://buzz.blogger.com/2009/06/zemanta-helps-y...
Now you got the Google people paying attention.
http://technbiz.blogspot.com/2009/06/google-wav...