-
Website
http://avc.com/ -
Original page
http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2008/08/the-new-avc-sam.html -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
ShanaC
1228 comments · 73 points
-
daryn
213 comments · 14 points
-
kidmercury
829 comments · 104 points
-
howardlindzon
207 comments · 71 points
-
Charlie Crystle
205 comments · 35 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Thoughts on Blackberry Fail
13 hours ago · 66 comments
-
Getting Computer Science Into Middle School
2 days ago · 267 comments
-
End of Year Music Posts
1 day ago · 46 comments
-
How To Get Me To Hang Up On You
4 days ago · 158 comments
-
Open APIs and Open Standards
5 days ago · 207 comments
-
Thoughts on Blackberry Fail
One thing you might want to be aware of this that avc.com is blocked by my (and likely others) work internet filters as "Computers/Internet;Spyware/Malware Sources". I imagine this is likely because of whatever content resided at the URL before you obtained it.
Not sure what you can do to fix things, but I thought you should know.
Also, something struck me while making this comment. I wasn't able to see the new design in my browser, but I could read the post in my RSS reader because it's hosted at Feedburner. I pulled out my Blackberry and checked out the site on the mobile browser. Then I headed over to the Disqus page for this post to leave a comment. That's 3 different ways I interacted with your blog without visiting in my browser.
Pretty cool.
As far as brand of web filter - I'm not sure. My guess is Websense, though our blocked site page is not branded. Websense is pretty widely installed, especially across investment banks (including my employer last summer) so I think a lot of potential or existing interested readers my be blocked.
Bill
I checked out Nathan's site and I love his design principles. Couldn't agree more:
* Goal Driven Design: Name the two most important things your blog needs to do for you. Design accordingly.
* Do the simplest thing that works.
* Launch, measure, tweak, repeat.
* 90% of good web design is whitespace, contrast, and generous font sizes.
* 90% of good Search Engine Optimization is in your <title>, URL, and writing.
How did you solve the problem of google juice, old links etc?
the latter is where my google juice is but i believe it will slowly move over to avc.com and at some point i will not be reliant on typepad for my google rank
Why not 301 redirect all your pages on avc.blogs.com to avc.com so both your readers and Google's bots know the new address?
I am going to engage Nathan in my own "ugly Typepad template" overhaul very soon! I feel the same way -- what started on a whim grew past my expectations, and it is time to make it look professional. Although I admit, I am going to leave Typepad altogether and go to Wordpress. :)
How many widgets have you cut off in the last year?
How many do you miss?
........"many of whom I have never met but consider friends and advisors."
Fred, this is why you have a people that follow you. You treat people with respect!
The key is putting all the external scripts at the very bottom of the HTML document so the page can render enough content to be readable while the rest of it loads. Moving the Twitter widget script to the bottom was a huge win, especially when Twitter's having a slow day.
Fun stats:
With an empty cache the avc.com homepage is 694.4K in total and makes 99(!) HTTP requests. Even with a primed cache it's 282.0K and 84 HTTP requests. Ouch. I wonder why more 3rd parties don't set long expiry headers (I'm looking at you Feedburner).
This is 1 topic that is arguably essential for a startup, and yet not well-publicly discussed. A url for your first-choice name of your company can do a lot towards making or breaking you. But most startups can't pay the gatekeeper.
Our society is so geared around "first come, first served". Apartments are grabbed via waiting lists, coveted concert tickets, new Nikes and new iPhones are all obtained via waiting in lines and getting there first, etc. And since a real value is generally attached, the rich (or motivated enough) can buy a place in line for all of the above. It's so ingrained in our heads that it's assumed.
But somehow I've never thought it correct that this should apply to domains. Yet it does, largely because it would be impossible to police and allocate based on merit who gets whose domain. I watched people grab up domain names back in '94 knowing that they could soon enough sell pepsi.org and businesses.com, etc, for big premiums. But I passed (likely on $millions) simply because i wouldn't want to admit that my money was made via a "I was here first!" strategy.
If you have a genuine need for a particular domain and don't wind up using it, or your business goes under, that's one thing. But deliberately shoving yourself in front of someone else as a forced gatekeeper for something obvious that you won't personally need seems something else, eg getting pepsi.org, chicagophilharmonic.com, etc
And while I agree that "i was here first" is often a key part of success, it's just lame when it's the only thing you've got. You can argue that in land speculation (assuming the buyer makes no improvements), or in wireless spectrum, it *is* all you got. But since the impact there is to the market at large rather than a particular company or individual, seems like less of a victim situation.
How would you like it if I had nabbed joshguttman.com soley so I could expect you to need to pay me for it? (Happens all the time, especially w/ celebrity names). vintagebikedude.com might be a bit of a different story (inside joke!)
I also feel like it's still lame even if it is more of a generic name (like businesses.com), which does make it less of the personal victim example.
I've always felt that there really should be a meritorious method to allocate domain names. Unfortunately, it would never be realistic to happen, so the market-driven way takes over.
but more importantly, thanks for the great content.
One thing I noticed is that I can't see the right column at all browsing with my iPhone.
Since mobile Safari renders full web pages, is it possible to distinguish that in the template when it's applied so that the entire page loads? I'm guessing Nathan can answer that.
It's good to see that avc.com is now in proper hands. Congrats.
One downside to mobile safari being so great is that it actually processes and renders a lot of Javascript sidebar items, even though they're hidden with CSS. So you take the hit but don't see the benefit. There's only so much you can do though because AFAIK TypePad doesn't offer mobile subdomains (like say m.avc.com) where you could have truly mobile optimized content.
It was a challenge getting things to look good and test them on mobile platforms, it's just so time/money intensive, like the bad old days of browser wars, but with more factions. At least Opera and Apple make it easy for you to test, Apple especially with their free SDK iPhone emulator.
I'm always shocked at how bad the Blackberry's built in browser is. They really need to step up, mobile Safari is seriously game changing.
We don't want *both* avc.com and avc.blogs.com to render duplicate content, we want the old "blogs.com" links to go away but fully redirect. It's basic good SEO. Can TypePad do proper 301 redirects?
Feature request: As I mentioned in an earlier comment, it would be really cool if TypePad offered "mobile" subdomains, for example m.avc.com. You could offer them as an upsell with some cool themes that would look good in iPhone, Blackberry, and other mobile browsers. TypePad would be fixing a major customer pain point (cross browser mobile testing? NOT FUN) and it would be a marketing win too.
I saw a bit about your frustration with TypePad - I'd be happy to talk with you about these issues and more, and if I don't know the answer, I'll get you on with the folks who do. you can also reach me at ginevra AT sixapart DOT com, and we can talk about how best to address the feature requests/redirects.
thanks!
fred
I always learn something new when I stop in here.
Now all you need to do is hire a few writers and raise a little VC cash!
When will design make it's way into RSS feeds?
It's a real shame about design characteristics not making it through RSS. Here you are with a blog, you've devoted a lot of time on it and have seen it grow enormously over the past 5 years. Your design has become a part of your brand-same could be said for Seth's blog and a ton of others.
Then you have RSS readers, which make reading all your feeds super easy. But in the end a part of your brand is completely lost. There was a time I would subscribe to a blog, read it for a couple months, then come across it through some other channel and have no idea I was already a subscriber.
The talk of blogging being dead has surfaced again. Maybe it's not blogging or the blogger, maybe it's the RSS reader. Oddly enough it's the same tool that makes blogs easier that may be killing it. Any who, there's a lot of room for improvement-both for the blogger and subscriber.
Even as a sometime SEO consultant, I tell people to worry about writing *far* more than they worry about SEO. It's good to have a great design and solid SEO, but they're both irrelevant unless you can apply them to a core of great content.
Anyway, anything bloggers lose in brand recognition because of RSS they more than make up for by making it easy for readers to keep up with them. And hey, you can always just add more inline images about yourself to posts right? Maybe someone should write a plugin to insert branded images into feeds.
As for blogging being dead, please. A few A-listers dramatically through in the towel and we're supposed to care? The important story is: Free Instantaneous Searchable Worldwide Publishing For All. How great is that?
Tumblr and posterous are leading the way to blogging that my mom can do
every day
fred
And, BTW, nice integration of the Lijit widget right into your search box! :) Its greatly appreciated.
We have been doing that with some WordPress blogs, its great to see it working on TypePad.
I noticed you have taken the sitemeter tag off of the main page. If you are going to use it as a tool it needs to be on all of your pages. Right now it is capturing visitors only to the stats page.
I think the new look is very clean and crisp. Great job.
When the ads are relevant, the ctrs are good
the ads are a lot further from the action in the new version.
--
Thanks for listening to www.fakedjs.com
Cool, lean fast and beautiful. I'll certainly take a leaf from you for my upcoming blog!
Thanks
Fred
PS. The great picture of you with your family shows that your priorities are properly aligned.
Cheers,
;dc
My wife, as usual, made the final call and it was the right one
And... as I'm of the "undesign" school of design... looking forward to natural degradation and graceful aging to resurface with time.
Your new blog format is AWESOME!
Keep the olive green too. Everyone is into "branding", and It's your trademark of sorts!
Love it!
Steve
This inspired me to find a solution for my wordpress blog to the iphone formatting problem, and I just installed this: http://www.bravenewcode.com/wptouch/
So far, so good. I'd love to see more solutions like this, and would suggest that Matt & Tony over at Automattic add a similar option for wordpress.com users.
P.S. The new login flow for disqus is MUCH improved.
There is no new RSS URL
We just messed up feedburner with a redirect issue
It should be fixed now