<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>A VC - Latest Comments in Thoughts On Choosing Board Members</title><link>http://avc.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://avc.disqus.com/thoughts_on_choosing_board_members_85/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 00:49:45 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Thoughts On Choosing Board Members</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/02/thoughts-on-cho/#comment-296346</link><description>&lt;p&gt;How do you best make your skills and talents available to companies who are seeking active board members?  I am interested in finding some solid opportunities to sit on the board of exciting companies in the education, alternative wellness, or healthcare industries. Thanks&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris J Snook</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 00:49:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts On Choosing Board Members</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/02/thoughts-on-cho/#comment-277428</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Equity will be more interesting to the best candidates&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think other founders and ceos (particularly ones who've done it a number of times) are the best board members&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Fred&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 14:36:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts On Choosing Board Members</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/02/thoughts-on-cho/#comment-273601</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Fred, &lt;br&gt;Could you expand a little on  how and where to find board members? Is salary or equity more attractive to board member?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Raouf</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 01:04:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts On Choosing Board Members</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/02/thoughts-on-cho/#comment-262974</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We are a small, music industry LLC - more than a decade old,   seeking to build an advisory board to assist in our transition from print to new media and to help take the company to the next level.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Concerned about potential conflict of interests when assembling a board - also since it's an advisory board only - how much of our financials are we required to share?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jlipton</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 13:54:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts On Choosing Board Members</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/02/thoughts-on-cho/#comment-209898</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Do you have any suggestions on how I can become a board member of a company?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kirk Badii</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 18:18:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts On Choosing Board Members</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/02/thoughts-on-cho/#comment-195600</link><description>&lt;p&gt;When you take outside investors, when you hire a bunch of employees, when&lt;br&gt;you have a bunch of customers, stuff like that&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 16:56:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts On Choosing Board Members</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/02/thoughts-on-cho/#comment-195587</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the quick reply, Fred.  What threshold would cause us to need a board?  (Perhaps that would be a good follow up post!)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scott Sanders</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 16:50:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts On Choosing Board Members</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/02/thoughts-on-cho/#comment-195556</link><description>&lt;p&gt;At this stage you don't need a board&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 16:28:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts On Choosing Board Members</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/02/thoughts-on-cho/#comment-195543</link><description>&lt;p&gt;A question when dealing with very small, private companies: I have a stake in a (very) small enterprise, with very little work necessary, and there's only two owners, including me.  We don't have a board.  Would it be in our interest to set one up?  Or would it be a hassle that would be annoying and unproductive, i.e., my partner's opinion!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scott Sanders</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 16:19:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts On Choosing Board Members</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/02/thoughts-on-cho/#comment-186560</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The corollary to all of the Boards is Ox-Sarbanis legislation making boards responsible. It's not a bad thing to have concsious boards. Unless you have board members willing to risk all for gutsy decisions You will founder in a storm. You need lions on the board, not sheep or fearful scardy cats. The more famous,  usually,  the more fearfull the board members are; of taking the difficult decisions. When You are in a fight for survival as most companies are more times than you think, who do you want fighting next to You? Choose guts over glory everyday of the week. They will stand by You when you are in a corner.&lt;br&gt;RESPONSIBILITY EARNS AUTHORITY; NOT VICE VERSA&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">panokroko</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 05:16:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts On Choosing Board Members</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/02/thoughts-on-cho/#comment-182875</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Fred,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for taking the time to articulate this. With the pressure to get a company moving in the right direction it is easy to assume that it is enough to have "stars" supporting the cause. The key seems to be that all members of the board support the success of the venture. This takes time, energy, creativity, and strong effective council. (Which we all need) Very cool stuff! I am a big fan of yours.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Schilling</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 23:25:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts On Choosing Board Members</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/02/thoughts-on-cho/#comment-181992</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great points.  Based on my learning all of the above is so true. Bad boards can kill a company.  Stumbled it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aruni S. Gunasegaram</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 18:07:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts On Choosing Board Members</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/02/thoughts-on-cho/#comment-180367</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Got another one:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;* Interview BOD members just as thoroughly as you would potential employees.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Why are they interested in serving? What value do they feel they bring to the group, the mission, ops, strategy, etc?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Board members are doing the organization a service, not a favor. They should be able to articulate this before they sign on. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jmccabegorman</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 10:39:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts On Choosing Board Members</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/02/thoughts-on-cho/#comment-179030</link><description>&lt;p&gt;cool&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 20:14:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts On Choosing Board Members</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/02/thoughts-on-cho/#comment-178955</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Looks like Yahoo could have been better of if they read this post few years ago.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chush.net</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 19:37:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts On Choosing Board Members</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/02/thoughts-on-cho/#comment-178895</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great post. I'm giving a  atalk at TED U Wednesday on Boards and will quote liberally from this (with credit where it's due).&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Howard</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 19:07:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts On Choosing Board Members</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/02/thoughts-on-cho/#comment-178796</link><description>&lt;p&gt;One of the best board members I've ever worked with was a very experienced lawyer. His firm represented the company but he didn't manage the account. He was compensated by getting an opportunity to invest in the venture round with the rest of us and he acted very independantly of his firm in his role as a board member&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So I would say that having a lawyer on your board can work but not the one who is directly representing your company every day&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Fred&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 18:24:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts On Choosing Board Members</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/02/thoughts-on-cho/#comment-178417</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Is it a conflict of interest to have your legal counsel on your board? if your legal counsel is business savvy, understands strategic issues and has shown a consistent commitment to company over many years?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anil Rathi</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 16:02:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts On Choosing Board Members</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/02/thoughts-on-cho/#comment-178384</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's funny&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 15:50:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts On Choosing Board Members</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/02/thoughts-on-cho/#comment-178373</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dissent and getting along are not mutually exclusive concepts&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Trust me on that&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Fred&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 15:49:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts On Choosing Board Members</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/02/thoughts-on-cho/#comment-178362</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's great if you can get them to purchase some stock. Granting options and&lt;br&gt;restricted stock is important but not as good as having real skin in the&lt;br&gt;game.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;fred&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 15:47:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts On Choosing Board Members</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/02/thoughts-on-cho/#comment-178349</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I hope you didn't read my fourth point as suggesting that you create a board&lt;br&gt;you have to fight with on all the big issues. That would be a terrible&lt;br&gt;thing. I agree that ³less engaged² often means problems.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;fred&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 15:45:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts On Choosing Board Members</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/02/thoughts-on-cho/#comment-178336</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good point Jonathan. I didn't mean family or personal relationship&lt;br&gt;conflicts. I was speaking more to business conflicts.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 15:45:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts On Choosing Board Members</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/02/thoughts-on-cho/#comment-178142</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Fred excellent post on choosing board members. most important of them is not having BIG names. I would like to add up few more points which I think are important in this context&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;* Board members are not hired to make the team LOOK good but to make the team function in good way. Many small startups fall in trap of hiring brand name guys to just attract VC / investors / employees / whatever. Though this will help you at some places, it is not that worth as it won't be much beneficial in the long run which you should care about&lt;br&gt;* You don't need to fill up all board members at the earliest. You can start with only three board members when you are small (just keep board members authorized for 5 but fill 3) and as you grow, you will understand who else you want on your board. This will make sure that you have the place for the best board members at a later stage.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Prashant</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 14:48:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts On Choosing Board Members</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/02/thoughts-on-cho/#comment-177674</link><description>&lt;p&gt;great post.  Good thoughts&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mike lewis</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 12:41:54 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>