<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>A VC - Latest Comments in Thoughts On FriendFeed</title><link>http://avc.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://avc.disqus.com/thoughts_on_friendfeed/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 10:20:09 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Thoughts On FriendFeed</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/03/thoughts-on-fri/#comment-262168</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I integrated it on my FF account too.&lt;br&gt;BTW, do comments left within FF (in response to Disqus comments) go back to Disqus?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Kinda like the Twitter response.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Abhishek</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 10:20:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts On FriendFeed</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/03/thoughts-on-fri/#comment-262046</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sweet&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Just added it&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;May blog it too&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 09:45:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts On FriendFeed</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/03/thoughts-on-fri/#comment-260201</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Disqus on FriendFeed:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.disqus.net/2008/03/24/add-your-disqus-profile-on-friendfeed/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://blog.disqus.net/2008/03/24/add-your-disqus-profile-on-friendfeed/"&gt;http://blog.disqus.net/2008...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">obscurelyfamous</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 17:39:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts On FriendFeed</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/03/thoughts-on-fri/#comment-255021</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I was about to post something on the request page at Disqus about this but luckily you're the first comment here :P&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I definitely want my comments to show up on the feed (integrating it with friendfeed's comments also sounds neat).  I just tried to add the rss for my latest as a blog entry and it failed mostly cos there exist 2 rss feeds at &lt;a href="http://disqus.com/people/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="disqus.com/people/"&gt;disqus.com/people/&lt;/a&gt;[user]/ (latest and friends).  This seems more like something FriendFeed should do.  Glad to hear you also want this!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sahil Desai</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 12:48:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts On FriendFeed</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/03/thoughts-on-fri/#comment-253752</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's what friendfeed is trying to do actually&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 22:28:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts On FriendFeed</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/03/thoughts-on-fri/#comment-251041</link><description>&lt;p&gt;do we really need to follow every discussion everywhere? Sometimes less is more, I guess. To put it differently, how much time can we devote to following discussions somewhere on the web, be it twitter, facebook, blogs, friendfeed or whereever? will something like APML take off?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nico Lumma</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 05:29:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts On FriendFeed</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/03/thoughts-on-fri/#comment-249709</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well only because all that attention is causing their servers to go down :) , I'm just kidding...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;fair enough. Ironically, I think there are a lot more people out there that "like" but don't "love" friendfeed, that just seems to get lost in all the hype.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But then again, I suppose a similar claim can be made for Twitter.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Roman Giverts</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 18:24:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts On FriendFeed</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/03/thoughts-on-fri/#comment-248204</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Robert,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What if every comment you left here could instantly be turned into a blog&lt;br&gt;post on your blog?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Would that change your perspective on ³it's not my blog²?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;fred&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 12:58:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts On FriendFeed</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/03/thoughts-on-fri/#comment-248009</link><description>&lt;p&gt;At least FriendFeed allows you an easy way to find your comments. Too bad there's isn't an easy way to quickly get to comments about your stream.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;P.S. As to why I'm commenting here. I saw the item in FriendFeed, then clicked on the link to actually read it. Since I was here anyway, I'm commenting here. Then I'll probably go back to the FriendFeed conversation about this post. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ontario Emperor</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 12:15:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts On FriendFeed</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/03/thoughts-on-fri/#comment-247687</link><description>&lt;p&gt;While Facebook is poised to soon pass MySpace I believe as the most viewed social network, it could also become  vulnerable over the long term to Friendfeed as well (although it could probably easily catch up) if Friendfeed provides a greater perceived valued to users. I also love Friendfeed (Bret Taylor interview on API etc. which we covered is amazing) and have been spending a lot less time on Facebook as I spend more on Friendfeed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's like Stumbleupon content discovery, but with a much better social aspect and much better organized (for those that want that, that isn't stumbleupon's function I would think as their very name - stumbleupon - strongly implies).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Friendfeed is largely twitter (and blogs) because those frequenting Friendfeed (that I've seen) rely on those. But it will broaden out, and as it does its value will also increase significantly.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I also think Friendfeed overlaps with functions of Titter as well. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AlexHammer</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 11:09:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts On FriendFeed</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/03/thoughts-on-fri/#comment-247587</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh yeah.  I can't wait to see how they make friendfeed even better.  It has soo helped me keep track of all my accounts…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I just blogged about it at…&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://webpoet.wordpress.com/2008/03/20/i-just-started-my-friendfeed/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://webpoet.wordpress.com/2008/03/20/i-just-started-my-friendfeed/"&gt;http://webpoet.wordpress.co...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;TWL&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">weblaureate</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 10:45:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts On FriendFeed</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/03/thoughts-on-fri/#comment-247479</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think the real value of these services is using the data it aggregates. By using your profile and the people you follow to create a personalized filter that sits in front of all feeds to cut down on noise. This would also allow for narrow searches, and recommendations. There are algorithms that have achieved similar goals, Monitor110's and Skygrid come to mind. Combined with social relevancy features similar to Xobni's and you have solved part of the real signal vs noise ratio. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joe Conyers III</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 10:25:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts On FriendFeed</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/03/thoughts-on-fri/#comment-247424</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm crying uncle.  If you are working at building a company and maintaining a network you have time for 1 maybe two social networking tools.  Now I have networks on Plaxo, Linked in, blog comment etc.  Can someone make this pain go away.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeff Grill</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 10:12:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts On FriendFeed</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/03/thoughts-on-fri/#comment-246982</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The first step in not feeling overwhelmed is realizing you don't need to see everything&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Frankly its not possible&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Fred&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 07:04:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts On FriendFeed</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/03/thoughts-on-fri/#comment-246957</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Fred,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The main problem I am currently seeing with friendfeed is that by not allowing you to export comments, they are weakening the services which they leverage.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;By offering the ability to post new content directly on friendfeed, and commenting internally on posts which they imported, overtime they will deminish the need of other services. I believe that it is a bad strategy, in particular for a service that integrates others.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tal Keinan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 06:33:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts On FriendFeed</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/03/thoughts-on-fri/#comment-246750</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i think twitter gets too much attention to be honest. not a week goes by without some post about twitter on techmeme.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;but you are right about my post. it's a bit about being on vacation and not wanting to spend too much time blogging, it's part that i didn't want to repeat what had already been said, and it's part that i like but don't love friendfeed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;fred&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 02:15:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts On FriendFeed</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/03/thoughts-on-fri/#comment-246739</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've hacked together a FriendFeed Comment Finder using Yahoo Pipes that people can use to get FriendFeed Comments as an RSS feed. Still in the experimental and might break phase :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://tinyurl.com/ys92bs" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://tinyurl.com/ys92bs"&gt;http://tinyurl.com/ys92bs&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">geekygirldawn</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 02:03:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts On FriendFeed</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/03/thoughts-on-fri/#comment-246629</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I like 'one stop shopping'.  I don't want to travel the web and type in various usernames to track what's happening with one person.  It's bad enough that my blog and my Myspace aren't the same page.  Streamline this shit.  That's the ticket.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jackson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:00:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts On FriendFeed</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/03/thoughts-on-fri/#comment-246555</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I love posting comments with Disqus. =)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Yea, lifecasting is cool, but the folks who will make the money will be those that "bring some focus to all the conversations we are having". A way to understand what the pictures, tweets, posts, etc all mean.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mrclark411</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 00:26:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts On FriendFeed</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/03/thoughts-on-fri/#comment-246034</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Still too noisy for me.  From what I can tell, most of my friends are well fed.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ceonyc</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 21:02:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts On FriendFeed</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/03/thoughts-on-fri/#comment-245778</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hate to say it, but kinda sounds like you wish Twitter was still getting all the attention and not FriendFeed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The post sounds very circumspect, which is kind of rare for this blog. Usually your posts have clear, strong, and direct opinions, this post was just kind of odd.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Roman Giverts</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 19:00:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts On FriendFeed</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/03/thoughts-on-fri/#comment-245585</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Fred - sometimes it's better to be late.  You get the whole picture and a better perspective.  The piece I did late yesterday threw us an unreal feedburner spike, not to mention a bunch of new Twitter and Friendfeed followers.  (Great to see Seidman back in the dialog!)&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">charlieanzman</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 17:42:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts On FriendFeed</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/03/thoughts-on-fri/#comment-245561</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i am glad I am not too early an adopter and just waited until the noise died down.  Now that I get it, I may try it.  thanks&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">howardlindzon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 17:35:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts On FriendFeed</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/03/thoughts-on-fri/#comment-245529</link><description>&lt;p&gt;not really, it' not my blog.  :) Short version "stuff the digerati gets in a frenzy over that doesn't pan out as well as anyone hoped".  I'd throw Twitter, Lifestreaming, Tumblr, all of that into niche stuff from the point of view of separate companies with distinct businesses.  Twitter functionality will live on, but will Twitter?  Tumblr functionality will live on, but will Tumblr? FriendFeed, etc...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;From the point of view of the VC, this thinking doesn't matter.  All that matters is having a chair when the music stops.  I don't fault Fred for having some variation of that world view.   I'm not looking at it through those glasses though.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Seidman</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 17:19:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts On FriendFeed</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/03/thoughts-on-fri/#comment-245323</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Lifestreaming seems to be the 2008 version of 1998's Geocities -- without as much actual usage.  I'll grant that there was in fact a lot of money to be made on Geocities, but there was money to be lost as well.  If I was able to short your investments in these type of services with a 5 year window, I surely would.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The market for getting attention will always be huge, but the market for things that demand your attention?  Not nearly so big. :-)   I'm not saying that doesn't mean Facebook, AOL, Yahoo, Microsoft or Google won't start buying these companies up,  but I am sugessting all that pans out as well as Yahoo/Geocities.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Seidman</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 16:13:50 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>