-
Website
http://avc.com/ -
Original page
http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2008/05/where-will-yhoo.html -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
ShanaC
1239 comments · 73 points
-
daryn
216 comments · 15 points
-
kidmercury
835 comments · 104 points
-
howardlindzon
207 comments · 71 points
-
Charlie Crystle
205 comments · 36 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Top Tracks of 2009
14 hours ago · 49 comments
-
Top 10 Records Of 2009
1 day ago · 73 comments
-
Getting Computer Science Into Middle School
6 days ago · 281 comments
-
Open APIs and Open Standards
1 week ago · 207 comments
-
Thoughts on Blackberry Fail
4 days ago · 77 comments
-
Top Tracks of 2009
If Microsoft are so confident in Yahoo's search/ads business, why should Yahoo give it away to them ???
If Yahoo really have it, they certainly don't need Microsoft at all.
YHOO will take a relatively small hit because of opportunists withdrawing.
At the end of the day, Microsoft may be helping Yahoo to get a just valuation.
Yahoo has a plan (bad or good, we'll see) and they met their financial goals, something Microsoft has failed to do.
Microsoft has no serious plan B, other than attempting a new acquisition again.
More interesting to me:
Expect a bigger hit in MSFT, *****who have no alternative strategy***** and some executive reshuffling.
How many shares will be dumped and how many will Jerry buy?
And executive roles reshuffling is possible too.
Big screwup, value destruction, failed financial goals, no Plan B in sight.
(other than possibly acquiring every other web 2.0 startup out there?)
If there's any rationality left, MSF should take a hit.
(which, of course... is not a sure thing)
http://timothysykes.com/2008/05/04/guess-yahoos...
Which tells me people are interested enough to do this without a reward
But I did comment on your post with my $26 guess
when the announcement was made, youll find that a lot of shareholders take profits while hedge funds jump in to try to scalp a few bucks.
that being said, had microsoft gone to a proxy fight, they would have won because all of those funds are voting to sell. its interesting that they didnt do this-- it would have been cheaper.
if you were simplifying it for a model you would assume that the chances of being rejected is the combined market share (as a %)
Management is Yahoos weakness, and they showed it again by snubbing this incredible deal for shareholders. However, the stock will remain inflated because once the dust settles, it will be clear Yang overplayed his hand, and will be forced by shareholders, hat in hand, to go back begging MS for the $33. They just better do it soon. The higher the probability that shareholder revolt forces Yahoo to accept, the higher the price. So, look for loud yelping to drive the stock up, and delusional confidence that Yahoo can improve revenues on their own to drive the stock down. I think it will touch $22, but close up around $24 - $26, mostly because yahoo is Absolutely insane not to take this deal, and soon!, and the market will be expecting/pricing that.
They've managed to get out of this so far, you know, it's Microsoft we're talking about.
Bear hug, and they got out of it.
How is that weak ????
That said, managers make bad decisions, and people freak out when the world changes; so it will drop a bit. Long-term this is going to make YHOO More valuable.
Yahoo is struggling, its fundamentals are detiorating, management has proven wishful but ineffective, and we are facing a recession. On its own, it slides down from 19... Both companies need each other.
Yahoo had a pretty good quarter and made several good moves, which didn't reflect in the stock price back then, because it was too high.
Anyhow, I voted on the site, but could be an RSS thing. I know you look for this stuff, so wanted to share.
Link to the count is in my post this am with the results
http://www.hubdub.com/m6879/What_Price_Will_Yah...
My money (and my vote) is on $22. Yahoo put up a defense that didn't really justify that they are worth more, they played hardball and lost. Microsoft may come back but not for some time and not at the same price.