-
Website
http://avc.com/ -
Original page
http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2008/06/zakaria-quote-2.html -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
ShanaC
1239 comments · 73 points
-
daryn
216 comments · 15 points
-
kidmercury
835 comments · 104 points
-
howardlindzon
207 comments · 71 points
-
Charlie Crystle
205 comments · 36 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Top Tracks of 2009
14 hours ago · 49 comments
-
Top 10 Records Of 2009
1 day ago · 73 comments
-
Getting Computer Science Into Middle School
6 days ago · 281 comments
-
Open APIs and Open Standards
1 week ago · 207 comments
-
Thoughts on Blackberry Fail
4 days ago · 77 comments
-
Top Tracks of 2009
Also, it must be said, a critical difference in the relations is that Israel and Brittain... They are "us," they are people like those who are in power, same race, same ancestry. It sounds racist, but it is true (and I am not a caucasian nor am I Jewish).
I don't see a big ol' brotherhgood with India happening in the next couple generations, sorry.
They are entrepreneurial, democratic, chaotic at times, but wonderful people
And they won't be taking our jobs for much longer
I think there are parts of the US that it may be less expensive to hire a
skilled worker in dollars than parts of India
fred
You just have to be in India for a couple of days to feel the entrepreneurial vibe - everyone wants to do something and they are thinking bigger and bigger. India may be their base, but their market is the world. It is wonderful to see this - the same atmosphere didn't exist in the 80s and 90s when I was growing up.
Amazing what a little deregulation mixed with democracy can do.
You might enjoy Zakaria's book. It's a very quick read. He talks a lot
about what India did right in the past 15 years.
It's very inspiring
Yes!
A close relationship between the US and India may be inevitable in the private sector, or the slices of it that are sufficiently Westernized and attuned to classical free enterprise thinking. There is nonetheless a huge disconnect between this increasingly sophisticated slice of the private sector and public policy and governance. The phenomenal recent growth in the Indian economy and the resulting transformation in lifestyle (esp in urban areas) is positively influencing attitudes towards the imperfections and chaos that riddle Indian society but there is still a long way to go in terms of actual changes in ground realities. For example, Indians of 15 years ago may have resigned themselves to pothole-ridden roads; today the roads are just as pothole-ridden but the people have hope gleaming in their eye, 'This road WILL get better and we WILL be around to see it'.
Part of the problem is a generational dynamic, and I don't mean just the Cold War-era attitudes of the US that may be traditionally distrustful of India. Governments in power aren't always in tune with the urban exuberance that is sweeping India. The Indian establishment dates from India's socialist days is skilled in the arts of bureaucracy, corruption and the so called License Raj (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Licence_Raj). Although I've noticed huge changes for the better in my recent visits to India, there are a lot of low-level inefficiencies in infrastructure and governance that can inflict serious injuries by a thousand cuts on someone who is not prepared for them.
I do think that a close alliance between Indian and the US, especially in the arena of free enterprise, would be hugely beneficial to both. India can take lessons in governance and infrastructure from the US, whereas the US can learn a thing or two from the entrepreneurial, risk-seeking ways of Indian culture that aren't necessarily inhibited by cold, hard logic.
Thanks for this post, Fred. I think you're going to be in for a great trip when you go to India at the end of this year.
Australia has been a staunch ally with US for decades.
I was quoting Zakaria
And it was in a chapter about India
So that's the context of the quote
i.e. are they going to drag us into wars, or are we going to drag them?
(somehow I have trouble seeing us commit militarily to India vs. Pakistan or China)
they are sixty years old now, it is time to grow up.
ok, said my piece. not politically correct, i know. that's life, it is non pc.
Israel is the only democracy in the area. They have been valuable allies in the areas of intelligence (in the sense of the CIA), military technology, etc. I hope you don't think that we should be lavishing this kind of attention on, say, Bolivia. Geographical proximity matters less and less these days.
Your statement "maybe they do control the money" reeks of anti-Semitism.
israel is the only democracy in the area? LOL. a war state and a democracy cannot co-exist. israel, like the US, has a fascist type of government masquerading as a democracy.
as always, all modern truths begin with 9/11, and so people should look into mossad involvement in 9/11 (note i said mossad....i did not say jewish....two completely different things and the real racism is to equate anything related to israel, a rather wicked country, with judaism [which is not wicked])
So why does the state of Israel make you so angry?